Skip to content
-
Subscribe to our newsletter & never miss our best posts. Subscribe Now!
  • https://www.facebook.com/
  • https://twitter.com/
  • https://t.me/
  • https://www.instagram.com/
  • https://youtube.com/
Add Button Text
HARP - On This. . .

A Commercial Real Estate and Business Thought-board

HARP - On This. . .

A Commercial Real Estate and Business Thought-board

  • Home
  • About
  • Activate
  • Cart
  • Checkout
  • Contact
  • Home
  • Members
  • My account
  • Privacy Policy
  • Register
  • Shop
  • Site-Wide Activity
  • Terms of Use
  • White Papers
  • Home
  • About
  • Activate
  • Cart
  • Checkout
  • Contact
  • Home
  • Members
  • My account
  • Privacy Policy
  • Register
  • Shop
  • Site-Wide Activity
  • Terms of Use
  • White Papers
Subscribe
Close

Search

BusinessCommercial Real EstateWhite Papers

Dancing with Gorillas – Roulette – and CRE Litigation

By Kymn Harp
September 25, 2013 8 Min Read
4

The Time to Decide – Commercial Real Estate Litigation

confident young businessman talk with black husband wife customers offer house to buy

A sage once said, “The time to worry about where the ball will drop is before the wheel is spun”.  He was speaking about roulette, of course, but the wisdom of these words has much broader application.  The point is, worry about the outcome before you place the bet, when you can still do something about it.

Commercial litigation, especially commercial real estate litigation, is in some respects like roulette. Once your lawsuit is filed, the wheel is spinning.  Unlike roulette, you may still have a measure of control over the outcome — but you are in it until the ball drops. 

In CRE litigation there is seldom an insurance company prepared to write a check.  There is a substantial risk the case will proceed to trial.  There is no guaranty you will collect anything – especially if payment of money is not the relief you seek. Consequently, there is very little chance your attorney will accept your commercial dispute on a contingent fee basis. A third of nothing is still nothing. 

RSP_LogoFull_2PMS

Lawyers handling commercial litigation are not your partners. Commercial litigators charge by the hour.  Except in rare cases where you can negotiate a hybrid fee arrangement, you will assume the entire financial risk – not your lawyer. Your lawyer is serving as your paid professional advocate; a hired gun, so to speak.

As long as you are willing and able to pay your lawyer to apply his or her skill and training to your cause, your lawyer is bound to represent you with zeal and vigor. If you do not pay, you should expect your lawyer to stop work.  The fact that the practice of law is a profession does not make it a charitable enterprise. It is both a profession and a business.  There is no moral or ethical imperative for a lawyer to work without pay while advocating a commercial dispute.  CRE litigation is business litigation – and the business being advanced is yours.

I am not a big fan of commercial litigation. It is expensive for my clients and distracts them from their core business.  It is in their core business where they make money.  It is because of their core business that I am their lawyer.  Still, if you are going to litigate, then commit to litigate. Do not file a lawsuit unless you intend to see it through and win.

If you know anything about law firm profitability, it may surprise you to hear me say I am not a huge fan of litigation. Lawsuits can be very profitable for lawyers. Lawsuits are labor intensive and can take on a life of their own.  Huge legal fees can be run up in a hurry.  If that is how you determine to spend your money then, by all means, call me.  My law firm has an outstanding group of litigators.  In commercial litigation, including CRE litigation, we combine our transactional knowledge with litigation prowess and are unsurpassed. I just think you ought to make an informed and seriously calculated decision before you decide to spend your money in this way.

Dancing Gorilla image [iStock license]

It is virtually impossible to predict with accuracy how much a lawsuit will cost.  Typically, it will cost much more than you imagine. This is because, unlike a business or real estate transaction you can choose to walk away from if it ceases to make economic sense, lawsuits, once filed, are not so easy to escape.  It’s like choosing to dance with an 800 pound gorilla.  As the joke goes, “When do you stop?  When the gorilla decides to stop.”  Once you have filed a lawsuit, or have taken a position in a dispute that will lead to your adversary filing a lawsuit, you have reached the dance floor and may very well find yourself cheek to cheek with an 800 pound gorilla.

Don’t get me wrong.  There are times when litigation is necessary and appropriate.  There are times when an adversary is so brazenly interfering with your business or trampling on your rights and interests that the benefits of litigation will far exceed your costs.  There are times when litigation is your only reasonable choice. 

In making the decision to proceed, however, understand the tangible and intangible costs.  Attorneys’ fees may run into tens of thousands of dollars, and in a complicated case perhaps even into the hundreds of thousands of dollars. The litigation may also distract you from your core business and subject you to significant emotional strain and sleepless nights.  Do not underestimate these add-on intangible costs. 

If you are going to litigate, be sure to hire a  lawyer experienced in the type of litigation you intend to  pursue.  Litigation strategy is based on game theory.  Each move you make must anticipate your adversary’s next several moves. Your strategy and its implementation must be designed to win and be agile enough to adapt to changing circumstances if your adversary moves forward in an unanticipated way.  Knowledge is power.

Part of what makes litigation emotionally draining is a lack of understanding about how the process works.  It is not as mysterious as clients sometimes seem to believe.

The bones of litigation are this:  You and your adversary are in disagreement. You are convinced your position is superior.  Your adversary is convinced its position is superior. You are unable to reach a compromise that works for you both.  Filing a lawsuit is a decision to let someone else decide. 

The litigation process is a process of gathering useful information to support your position and to undermine your opponent’s position. Your adversary is engaged in the same process. Some of this information is applicable law. Much of the information is supporting facts. Ultimately, you will each present your compiled information to an independent decision maker.  A judge or jury will decide.

If you are going to litigate, the decision to do so should be based upon a sober determination of the benefits likely to be achieved, the costs of obtaining those benefits, and your likelihood of success.  You may have the greatest case in the world; your lawyer may tell you it will be a “slam dunk”; but if it is going to cost you more than you reasonably expect to gain – measuring both tangible and intangible costs – at least consider the choice of not proceeding. The decision to proceed or not to proceed is yours. It is very much a business decision.  

In making the decision to litigate, use the same skills of economic analysis you use to make real estate investment decisions. If you know it will cost you $2,000,000 to develop and market a project, but your likely return is only $1,500,000, would you proceed?  If your disputed claim is for $50,000 but it will cost you $60,000 to $100,000 to collect, should you proceed?  The answer may depend upon other factors as well but, all else being equal, the rational economic choice is obvious.

Too often lawsuits are filed as an emotional response to a perceived slight rather than being based upon an objective determination that the lawsuit is in your best economic interest. Do not let elevated testosterone levels get in the way of making a rational economic decision.  The  lawsuit is likely to continue long after your passions have faded.  By that time, you may be wrapped in the arms of that 800 pound gorilla.  If you have not made the decision to litigate based upon legitimate and dispassionate commercial considerations, you may find that your only way out is to settle on highly unfavorable terms.  This will not help you prosper.

A common mistake clients make is to assume that if a dispute is over only $10,000 to $50,000, the attorneys’ fees for pursuing or defending the case will be proportionately less than if the lawsuit involved $100,000 to $1,000,000.  This is not necessarily so.  The amount of time it takes to prove your case has very little to do with the amount in dispute.  The facts and issues, and the response of your adversary, determine the amount of time involved.  Since commercial litigation is typically billed by the hour, more time means higher attorneys’ fees regardless of the amount in dispute.  This reality should be taken into consideration when deciding to file suit, and likewise when considering an offer of settlement.

Some protection may be provided by the documents if they provide for the successful party to recover attorneys’ fees and costs from the unsuccessful party. But note: (i) you had better be sure you will be the successful party, or you may end up paying your adversary’s attorneys’ fees as well as your own; and (ii) you should consider whether a judgment against this particular defendant is likely to be collected.  If the defendant is on the verge of bankruptcy, or otherwise insolvent, obtaining a judgment that includes all of your attorneys’ fees will do you little good.  You will have just spent more money that will  not be collectible.  As the saying goes: “When you find yourself in a hole – stop digging.”

Remember.  The commercial dispute forming the basis of your lawsuit is yours, not your attorney’s.  Your attorney’s business is to represent you as your skilled professional advocate. Attorneys are bound to zealously advocate for your success, but they can not guaranty success and collection.

Deciding to file a lawsuit in a commercial dispute should be like deciding to get a kidney transplant.  It should be a decision that is not entered into lightly, and should be made only if the benefits to be obtained are greater than the burdens the procedure will entail. If you decide on a new kidney and go under the knife, be prepared to see it through. If, after the procedure has begun and your kidney has been removed, you change you mind and decide against a transplant, your decision is a bit too late.  The time to make that decision was before you got on the operating table.

I am not saying you should never file a lawsuit.  Each circumstance merits its own evaluation. What I am saying is that the time to decide is before the suit is filed.  Once filed, be prepared to do what must be done to win.  It is too late to un-spin the wheel.

                                                                                    Thanks for listening,

                                                                                                 Kymn

 

 

 

Share this:

  • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • More
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Print (Opens in new window) Print

Related

Tags:

#CREbankbankersbanksbrokerbusinessChicagocommercial litigationcommercial real estateconsequencesCRE litigationdefaultdefensedevelopmentenforcement actionsforeclosureindustrial propertyinvestmentlenderslendingloan workoutsloanspropertypurchaseshould I suesuittransactionswhat to look for
Author

Kymn Harp

Kymn Harp is a solutions oriented commercial real estate and business attorney in Chicago, Illinois. Harp is a Shareholder in the Chicago office of Buchalter, APC, a full service law firm representing middle market businesses, business owners, commercial real estate investors and developers, banks, and wealthy individuals. Representing commercial real estate owners and developers and private sector businesses since 1978, Harp focuses on understanding his clients' precise business needs and then developing and implementing creative best practice solutions. Kymn (pronounced "Kim") is a frequent speaker at industry and bar related conferences, and an author of numerous articles on topics of interest to the commercial real estate industry and privately held business owners. He is the author of "ILLINOIS COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE - Due Diligence to Closing, w/Checklists", a book focused on due diligence and commercial real estate, available at Amazon.com and other online bookstores. Harp believes that in order to get what you want, you have to know what you want. You must employ due diligence in understanding the obstacles and opportunities presented, and in developing and executing a plan of action. There is no reliable shortcut to having a precise objective and an understanding of exactly how to achieve it.

Follow Me
Other Articles
Previous

REAFFIRMED: LLC Members Do NOT Have Interest in LLC Property

Next

Land Patent Defense is Frivolous, Sanctionable, and a Class 4 Felony in Illinois

4 Comments
  1. Greg Trotter says:
    September 26, 2013 at 2:19 pm

    Well said with the correct weight needed to be aware before moving forward with a law suit. It is always worse in time, money and emotional toil than ever calculated at the onset. The outcome can never be assured.

    Reply
  2. Michael D. Poulos says:
    September 28, 2013 at 7:49 pm

    Thank you for an excellent discussion of an important issue. When was the last time you had a client who was happy he brought a lawsuit, even a successful lawsuit?

    Reply
  3. Howard F. Kline says:
    September 29, 2013 at 8:35 am

    Kymn: Much of what you write about I agree with as do my long term clients. As is much in life, whatever you do, have the goal in mind first. With all clients, I always take the default position that they have to be committed to the end and hope that we don’t have to go that far. Rarely is anyone happy if you have to go the “whole 9 yards.” Clients get tired of writing checks to me without seeing definitive results.

    When money is the key issue, we always, first pay attention to whether or not we are likely to collect. Sometimes that analysis is either than other times, but that is always our starting point, are we going to get the money or not. The goal is always to maximize recovery while minimizing cost to the client, (cost does include time and attention to a matter that usually distracts them from making money in their usual business).

    I disagree that we are just advocates. I am an advisor and often recommend to my clients that the not file litigation because of my belief that their costs will exceed the benefits. My clients that I have had for more than 20 years, appreciate this in me. They expect more from me than an advocate. They expect a trust advisor. Based upon your article, I suspect your good clients see you in the same light.

    Reply
  4. Kymn Harp says:
    September 29, 2013 at 9:50 am

    Thanks Howard. You are exactly right. As attorneys representing our clients, we should use our knowledge and experience to fully advise them as to not only their legal rigjts and remedies, but also the likely consequences of their contemplated course of action.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Copyright 2026 — HARP - On This. . .. All rights reserved. Blogsy WordPress Theme

Loading Comments...