<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
>
<channel>
<title>enforcement actions – HARP – On This. . .</title>
<atom:link href="http://harp-onthis.com/tag/enforcement-actions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
<link>http://harp-onthis.com</link>
<description>A Commercial Real Estate and Business Thought-board</description>
<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2024 12:03:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
<language>en-US</language>
<sy:updatePeriod>
hourly </sy:updatePeriod>
<sy:updateFrequency>
1 </sy:updateFrequency>
<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.7.2</generator>
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">48775862</site> <item>
<title>COMMERCIAL LANDLORD-TENANT – Part 2 – The Covenant of Quiet Enjoyment</title>
<link>http://harp-onthis.com/commercial-landlord-tenant-part-2-the-covenant-of-quiet-enjoyment/</link>
<comments>http://harp-onthis.com/commercial-landlord-tenant-part-2-the-covenant-of-quiet-enjoyment/#comments</comments>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kymn Harp]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2015 11:00:24 +0000</pubDate>
<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[Commercial Real Estate]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[Landlord-Tenant]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[White Papers]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[#CRE]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[adaptive reuse]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[closing]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[closings]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[commercial landlord tenant]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[commercial lease]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[commercial real estate]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[commercial tenant rights]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[conducting due diligence]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[consequences]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[default]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[development]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[due diligence checklist]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[due diliigence]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[enforcement actions]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[investment]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[keys to closing]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[purchase]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[quiet enjoyment]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[real estate]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[urban infill]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[what to look for]]></category>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://harp-onthis.com/?p=1065</guid>
<description><![CDATA[This is Part 2 of a multi-part series of articles discussing the duties, rights and remedies of commercial real estate tenants in Illinois. Part 1, entitled “Getting It Right” discussed the importance of clarity in lease drafting, and the potential […]]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<blockquote class="wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow">
<p></p>
</blockquote>
<div class="wp-block-image">
<figure class="alignleft is-resized"><a href="https://i0.wp.com/harp-onthis.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/Harp-3_17_15-019.jpg"><img data-recalc-dims="1" fetchpriority="high" decoding="async" width="199" height="300" data-attachment-id="1145" data-permalink="http://harp-onthis.com/due-diligence-checklists-for-commercial-real-estate-transactions-3/harp-3_17_15-019/" data-orig-file="https://i0.wp.com/harp-onthis.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/Harp-3_17_15-019.jpg?fit=2848%2C4288" data-orig-size="2848,4288" data-comments-opened="1" data-image-meta="{"aperture":"9","credit":"","camera":"NIKON D300","caption":"","created_timestamp":"1426589698","copyright":"","focal_length":"52","iso":"200","shutter_speed":"0.008","title":"","orientation":"0"}" data-image-title="Harp 3_17_15-019" data-image-description="" data-image-caption="<p>R. Kymn Harp<br />
Robbins, Salomon & Patt, Ltd.</p>
" data-medium-file="https://i0.wp.com/harp-onthis.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/Harp-3_17_15-019.jpg?fit=199%2C300" data-large-file="https://i0.wp.com/harp-onthis.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/Harp-3_17_15-019.jpg?fit=680%2C1024" src="https://i0.wp.com/harp-onthis.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/Harp-3_17_15-019.jpg?resize=199%2C300" alt="R. Kymn Harp Robbins, Salomon & Patt, Ltd." class="wp-image-1145" style="width:175px;height:245px" srcset="https://i0.wp.com/harp-onthis.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/Harp-3_17_15-019.jpg?resize=199%2C300 199w, https://i0.wp.com/harp-onthis.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/Harp-3_17_15-019.jpg?resize=680%2C1024 680w, https://i0.wp.com/harp-onthis.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/Harp-3_17_15-019.jpg?w=2000 2000w" sizes="(max-width: 199px) 100vw, 199px" /></a><figcaption class="wp-element-caption">R. Kymn Harp<br />Robbins, Salomon & Patt, Ltd.</figcaption></figure></div>
<div class="wp-block-image">
<figure class="alignleft"><a href="https://i0.wp.com/harp-onthis.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/Catherine-Cooke-Shareholder-at-RSP.jpg"><img data-recalc-dims="1" decoding="async" width="175" height="245" data-attachment-id="1051" data-permalink="http://harp-onthis.com/commercial-landlord-tenant-issues-part-1-getting-it-right/catherine-cooke-shareholder-at-rsp/" data-orig-file="https://i0.wp.com/harp-onthis.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/Catherine-Cooke-Shareholder-at-RSP.jpg?fit=175%2C245" data-orig-size="175,245" data-comments-opened="1" data-image-meta="{"aperture":"9","credit":"","camera":"NIKON D7000","caption":"","created_timestamp":"1367319064","copyright":"","focal_length":"98","iso":"125","shutter_speed":"0.008","title":"","orientation":"1"}" data-image-title="Catherine Cooke" data-image-description="" data-image-caption="<p>Catherine Cooke<br />
Robbins, Salomon & Patt, Ltd.</p>
" data-medium-file="https://i0.wp.com/harp-onthis.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/Catherine-Cooke-Shareholder-at-RSP.jpg?fit=175%2C245" data-large-file="https://i0.wp.com/harp-onthis.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/Catherine-Cooke-Shareholder-at-RSP.jpg?fit=175%2C245" src="https://i0.wp.com/harp-onthis.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/Catherine-Cooke-Shareholder-at-RSP.jpg?resize=175%2C245" alt="Catherine Cook Shareholder at Robbins, Salomon & Patt, Ltd." class="wp-image-1051"/></a><figcaption class="wp-element-caption">Catherine A. Cooke<br /> Robbins, Salomon & Patt, Ltd.</figcaption></figure></div>
<p><em>This is Part 2 of a multi-part series of articles discussing the duties, rights and remedies of commercial real estate tenants in Illinois. <a title="Commercial Landlord-Tenant Issues – PART 1 – Getting it Right" href="http://harp-onthis.com/commercial-landlord-tenant-issues-part-1-getting-it-right/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Part 1, entitled “Getting It Right”</a> discussed the importance of clarity in lease drafting, and the potential for unintended leasehold easements for parking, and other uses.</em></p>
<p><em>In March 2015, the Illinois Institute for Continuing Legal Education (“IICLE”) published its 2015 Edition practice handbook entitled: Commercial Landlord-Tenant Practice. To provide best-practice guidance to all Illinois attorneys, IICLE recruits experienced attorneys with relevant knowledge to write each handbook chapter. For the 2015 Edition, IICLE asked R. Kymn Harp and Catherine A. Cooke to write the chapter entitled Tenant’s Duties, Rights and Remedies. We were, of course, pleased to oblige. Although each of us represent commercial landlords at least as often as we represent commercial tenants, a clear understanding of the duties, rights and remedies of commercial real estate tenants is critical when representing either side of the commercial lease transaction. </em></p>
<p><em>The following is an excerpt (slightly edited) from our chapter in the 2015 Edition. We hope you find this excerpt, and the excerpts that will follow, informative and useful. Feel free to contact IICLE directly to purchase the entire volume.</em></p>
<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><span style="color: #1897ab;">The COVENANT OF QUIET ENJOYMENT </span><br /><span style="color: #1897ab;">What Is It? — General Principles</span></h2>
<div class="wp-block-image">
<figure class="alignright size-full is-resized"><img data-recalc-dims="1" decoding="async" width="1000" height="667" data-attachment-id="1836" data-permalink="http://harp-onthis.com/commercial-landlord-tenant-part-2-the-covenant-of-quiet-enjoyment/sweetidleness-lazyyounghispanicladysitinrelaxedpose/" data-orig-file="https://i0.wp.com/harp-onthis.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/successful-female-new-flat-apartment-buyer-rest-at-home-feel-pleasure.jpg?fit=1000%2C667" data-orig-size="1000,667" data-comments-opened="1" data-image-meta="{"aperture":"0","credit":"Shutterstock","camera":"","caption":"","created_timestamp":"0","copyright":"Copyright (c) 2022 fizkes\/Shutterstock. No use without permission.","focal_length":"0","iso":"0","shutter_speed":"0","title":"Sweet,Idleness.,Lazy,Young,Hispanic,Lady,Sit,In,Relaxed,Pose","orientation":"1"}" data-image-title="Sweet,Idleness.,Lazy,Young,Hispanic,Lady,Sit,In,Relaxed,Pose" data-image-description="" data-image-caption="" data-medium-file="https://i0.wp.com/harp-onthis.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/successful-female-new-flat-apartment-buyer-rest-at-home-feel-pleasure.jpg?fit=300%2C200" data-large-file="https://i0.wp.com/harp-onthis.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/successful-female-new-flat-apartment-buyer-rest-at-home-feel-pleasure.jpg?fit=1000%2C667" src="https://i0.wp.com/harp-onthis.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/successful-female-new-flat-apartment-buyer-rest-at-home-feel-pleasure.jpg?resize=1000%2C667" alt="successful female new flat apartment buyer rest at home feel pleasure" class="wp-image-1836" style="width:400px;height:267px" srcset="https://i0.wp.com/harp-onthis.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/successful-female-new-flat-apartment-buyer-rest-at-home-feel-pleasure.jpg?w=1000 1000w, https://i0.wp.com/harp-onthis.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/successful-female-new-flat-apartment-buyer-rest-at-home-feel-pleasure.jpg?resize=300%2C200 300w, https://i0.wp.com/harp-onthis.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/successful-female-new-flat-apartment-buyer-rest-at-home-feel-pleasure.jpg?resize=768%2C512 768w" sizes="(max-width: 1000px) 100vw, 1000px" /></figure></div>
<p>It has long been the law in Illinois that a covenant of quite enjoyment is implied in all lease agreements. <em>Blue Cross Ass’n v. 666 N. Lake Shore Drive Associates</em>, 100 Ill.App.3d 647, 427 N.E.2d 270, 273, 56 Ill.Dec. 290 (1st Dist. 1981); <em>64 East Walton, Inc. v. Chicago Title & Trust Co</em>., 69 Ill.App.3d 635, 387 N.E.2d 751, 755, 25 Ill.Dec. 875 (1st Dist. 1979); <em>Berrington v. Casey</em>, 78 Ill. 317, 319 (1875); <em>Wade v. Halligan</em>, 16 Ill. 507, 511 (1855).</p>
<p>A covenant of quiet enjoyment “promises that the tenant shall enjoy the possession of the premises in peace and without disturbance.” [Emphasis in original.] <em>Checkers, Simon & Rosner v. Lurie Co</em>., No. 87 C 5405, 1987 WL 18930 at *3 (N.D.Ill. Oct. 20, 1987). This does not mean, however, that no breach of the covenant of quiet enjoyment may be found in a leasehold without a finding that the lessor intended to deprive the lessee of possession. <em>Blue Cross Ass’n, supra</em>, 427 N.E.2d at 27. It simply means that a tenant must actually be in possession of the premises to claim a breach of the covenant of quiet enjoyment. If the tenant has already vacated the premises before the disturbance has commenced, no breach of the covenant of quiet enjoyment occurs. <em>Checkers, Simon & Rosner, supra</em>, 1987 WL 18930 at *3.</p>
<div class="wp-block-image">
<figure class="alignleft"><a href="https://i0.wp.com/harp-onthis.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/RSP_LogoHD-3.jpg"><img data-recalc-dims="1" loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="300" height="109" data-attachment-id="1041" data-permalink="http://harp-onthis.com/illinois-llcs-the-asset-protection-advantage/rsp_logohd-3/" data-orig-file="https://i0.wp.com/harp-onthis.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/RSP_LogoHD-3.jpg?fit=963%2C350" data-orig-size="963,350" data-comments-opened="1" data-image-meta="{"aperture":"0","credit":"","camera":"","caption":"","created_timestamp":"0","copyright":"","focal_length":"0","iso":"0","shutter_speed":"0","title":"","orientation":"1"}" data-image-title="RSP_LogoHD (3)" data-image-description="" data-image-caption="" data-medium-file="https://i0.wp.com/harp-onthis.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/RSP_LogoHD-3.jpg?fit=300%2C109" data-large-file="https://i0.wp.com/harp-onthis.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/RSP_LogoHD-3.jpg?fit=963%2C350" src="https://i0.wp.com/harp-onthis.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/RSP_LogoHD-3.jpg?resize=300%2C109" alt="RSP_LogoHD (3)" class="wp-image-1041" srcset="https://i0.wp.com/harp-onthis.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/RSP_LogoHD-3.jpg?resize=300%2C109 300w, https://i0.wp.com/harp-onthis.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/RSP_LogoHD-3.jpg?w=963 963w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px" /></a></figure></div>
<p>An implied covenant of quiet enjoyment includes, “absent a lease clause to the contrary, the right to be free of the lessors’ intentional interference with full enjoyment and use of the leased premises.” <em>Infinity Broadcasting Corporation of Illinois v. Prudential Insurance Company of America</em>, No. 86 C 4207, 1987 WL 6624 at *5 (N.D.Ill. Feb. 9, 1987), aff’d, 869 F.2d 1073 (7th Cir. 1989), quoting <em>American Dairy Queen Corp. v. Brown-Port Co</em>., 621 F.2d 255, 258 (7th Cir. 1980).</p>
<p>If the landlord breaches the covenant of quiet enjoyment, the lessee may remain in possession and claim damages for breach of lease. In such case, the measure of damages is the difference between the rental value of the premises in light of the breached covenant of quiet enjoyment and the rent that the tenant agreed to pay under the lease, together with such special damages as may have been directly and necessarily incurred by the tenant in consequence of the landlord’s wrongful act. <em>64 East Walton, supra</em>, 387 N.E.2d at 755.</p>
<p>Although Illinois cases defining the precise scope of a covenant of quiet enjoyment are rare, BLACK’S LAW DICTIONARY, pp. 1248 – 1249 (6th ed. 1993) defines “quiet enjoyment” in connection with the landlord-tenant relationship as “the tenant’s right to freedom from serious interferences with his or her tenancy. <em>Manzaro v. McCann</em>, 401 Mass. 880, 519 N.E.2d 1337, 1341. (Ringing for more than one day of smoke alarms in an apartment building could be sufficient interference with the tenants’ quite enjoyment of leased premises to justify relief against the landlord.).”</p>
<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><span style="color: #1897ab;">HOW THE COVENANT OF QUIET ENJOYMENT MAY APPLY— CASE LAW</span></h2>
<p>In <em>Blue Cross Ass’n v. 666 N. Lake Shore Drive Associates</em>, 100 Ill.App.3d 647, 427 N.E.2d 270, 273, 56 Ill.Dec. 290 (1st Dist. 1981), the First District Appellate Court discussed the covenant of quiet enjoyment in the lease as granting the tenant a right of quiet and peaceful possession and enjoyment of the whole premises and equated a breach of quiet enjoyment under a lease to a private nuisance. “A private nuisance in a leasehold situation is ‘an individual wrong arising from an unreasonable, unwarranted or unlawful use of one’s property producing such material annoyance, inconvenience, discomfort, or hurt that the law will presume a consequent damage.’ ” Id., quoting <em>Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. LaSalle National Bank</em>, 77 Ill.App.3d 478, 395 N.E.2d 1193, 1198, 32 Ill.Dec. 812 (1st Dist. 1979).</p>
<p>The tenant had entered into a five-year lease on August 22, 1978, with a five-year renewal option, for approximately 53,000 square feet of the </p>
<span id="more-1065"></span>
<p>15th floor of the building located at 666 North Lake Shore Drive in Chicago. The lease stated that the premises were to be used for computer installation and general office space, and the tenant expended in excess of $2,000,000 in leasehold improvements, installed approximately $6,000,000 in computer equipment, and was fully operational in August 1980.</p>
<p>In April 1979, the building was purchased by a new owner for the purpose of converting it to a mixed-use residential, commercial, and office facility. In August 1979, the new owner advised the tenant that the renovation program required alternations in the plaintiff’s leasehold in the form of physical penetrations for installation of plumbing, ventilation, and electrical risers to service the condominium and office areas on floors above and below the tenant’s leased premises. The tenant refused to permit penetrations into the plaintiff’s leased space. Notwithstanding the tenant’s refusal, the landlord proceeded with construction and penetrated the tenant’s space for installation of the risers in accordance with the landlord’s renovation plans. The tenant sued to obtain a preliminary injunction, but the trial court declined to issue injunctive relief. The tenant appealed.</p>
<p>On appeal, the appellate court reversed the trial court, stating: “Paragraph 42A of the lease expressly grants (tenant) the right of quiet and peaceful possession and enjoyment. The meaning of this clause is not controverted. (Tenant) had a right to seek injunctive relief for its breach when the conduct of (landlord) substantially interfered with (tenants’) use and enjoyment of the premises.” 427 N.E.2d at 273.</p>
<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><span style="color: #1897ab;">PRIVATE NUISANCE DISTINGUISHED</span></h2>
<p>Similar to breach of the covenant of quiet enjoyment is the tort of maintaining a nuisance. In <em>Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. LaSalle National Bank</em>, 77 Ill.App.3d 478, 395 N.E.2d 1193, 1198, 32 Ill.Dec. 81 (1st Dist. 1979), the First District Appellate Court stated:</p>
<blockquote class="wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow">
<p>A private nuisance is a nontrespassory invasion of another’s interest in the private use and enjoyment of land. . . . It is an individual wrong arising from an unreasonable, unwarranted or unlawful use of one’s property producing such material annoyance, inconvenience, discomfort, or hurt that the law will presume consequent damage. . . . What is an unreasonable use of one’s property under the circumstances, is determined by weighing the following factors:</p>
<p>(a) The extent of the harm involved;</p>
<p>(b) the character of the harm involved;</p>
<p>(c) the social value that the law attaches to the type of use or enjoyment invaded;</p>
<p>(d) the suitability of the particular use or enjoyment invaded to the character of the locality; and</p>
<p>(e) the burden on the person harmed or avoiding the harm.</p>
<p>. . . The weight that each factor is accorded is relative to the circumstances of the case.” [Citations omitted.]
</blockquote>
<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><span style="color: #1897ab;">SCOPE OF INVASION</span></h2>
<p>Although <em>Blue Cross Ass’n, supra</em>, involved a physical invasion of the tenant’s space, physical invasion is not necessarily required. A tenant has a right to the full use and enjoyment of the leased premises without the landlord’s intentional interference, absent a lease clause to the contrary. Infinity Broadcasting, supra. By equating a breach of the covenant of quiet enjoyment to a private nuisance, the Illinois Appellate Court, in <em>Blue Cross Ass’n, supra</em>, inferred that the breach could be a nontrespassory invasion into the tenant’s leased premises.</p>
<p><span style="color: #1897ab;"><strong>Query:</strong></span> Do the following activities by a landlord constitute a breach of the covenant of quiet enjoyment, absent an express lease clause permitting these activities, if the activities cause material annoyance, inconvenience, discomfort or hurt to the commercial tenant?</p>
<p><strong><span style="color: #1897ab;">√</span></strong> Loud construction on adjacent or nearby premises during normal business hours?</p>
<p><strong><span style="color: #1897ab;">√</span></strong> Prolonged disruption of elevator service or other access to the premises during normal business hours?</p>
<p><strong><span style="color: #1897ab;">√</span></strong> Failure to maintain working HVAC suitable to the tenant’s commercially reasonable use of the leased premises?</p>
<p><span style="color: #1897ab;"> </span><strong><span style="color: #1897ab;">PRACTICE POINTER</span></strong></p>
<p><span style="color: #1897ab;">A landlord in a multi-tenant building would be wise to include as part of the landlord’s “standard boilerplate” provisions, a modified covenant of quiet enjoyment granting landlord the right to reasonably penetrate the leased premises as necessary, appropriate or convenient to install and maintain plumbing, electrical, telecommunications, fire suppression, HVAC and other components and systems as determined by landlord, in landlord’s sole discretion, to be necessary, useful or convenient to the preparation, use and/or occupancy of other portions of the building, and to conduct construction activities in adjacent or nearby premises, and to temporarily modify the means and/or configuration of access to the premises for safety or convenience, so long as such activities do not unreasonably interfere with commercially reasonable use of the leased premises by tenant for the purposes for which the premises are leased. If the landlord fails to include such a provision, the tenant may have to right to stop landlord’s work.</span></p>
<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><span style="color: #1897ab;">LIGHT AND AIR</span></h2>
<p>The covenant of quiet enjoyment does not guarantee a tenant a right to unobstructed light and air. In <em>Keating v. Springer</em>, 146 Ill. 481, 34 N.E. 805, 807 (1893), the Illinois Supreme Court held that “a landlord will not be liable for obstructing his tenant’s windows by building on an adjacent [lot], in the absence of any covenant or agreement in the lease forbidding him to do so.”</p>
<p>Similarly, in <em>Baird v. Hanna</em>, 328 Ill. 436, 159 N.E. 793, 794 (1927), the Illinois Supreme Court held that “the simplest rule, and that best suited to a country like the United States, in which changes are continually taking place in the ownership and in the use of lands, is that no easement of light can be acquired without the express grant of an interest in, or covenant relating to, the lands over which the right is claimed.”</p>
<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><span style="color: #1897ab;">TELEVISION AND RADIO SIGNALS</span></h2>
<p>A claimed right to unobstructed transmission of television and radio signals has been held to the same standard and analysis as a claimed right to unobstructed light and air. While not actually a landlord-tenant case, <em>People ex rel. Hoogasian v. Sears, Roebuck & Co</em>., 52 Ill.2d 301, 287 N.E.2d 677 (1972), is instructive in its clarification that claimed easements for television and radio signals will be governed by the same analysis as claimed easements for light and air.</p>
<p>In <em>Hoogasian</em>, certain villages in the Chicago area sued to enjoin Sears from constructing the high-rise office building that became known as “Sears Tower” (now Willis Tower), contending that the tower would distort television reception and depress real estate values, and therefore constitute a nuisance. The Illinois Supreme Court upheld dismissal of the case, determining that the same standard applicable to light and air applies to television and radio signals, and applied the general rule that a landowner has no legal right to the free flow of light and air across the adjoining land of his or her neighbor. See also <em>Infinity Broadcasting Corporation of Illinois v. Prudential Insurance Company of America</em>, No. 86 C 4207, 1987 WL 6624 at *5 (N.D.Ill. Feb. 9, 1987), aff’d, 869 F.2d 1073 (7th Cir. 1989).</p>
<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><span style="color: #1897ab;">DAMAGES FOR BREACH OF THE COVENANT OF QUIET ENJOYMENT</span></h2>
<p>In <em>64 East Walton, Inc. v. Chicago Title & Trust Co</em>., 69 Ill.App.3d 635, 387 N.E.2d 751, 25 Ill.Dec. 875 (1st Dist. 1979), the landlord did not contest that there was a breach of the covenant of quiet enjoyment but did contest the amount of damages awarded. In analyzing the scope of damages a tenant could recover for breach of the covenant of quiet enjoyment, the court stated:</p>
<blockquote class="wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow">
<p>The relevant law, although by no means plentiful, is clear. A covenant of quiet enjoyment is implied in all lease agreements. . . . If the lessor breaches the covenant, the lessee may remain in possession and thus be liable for rent but still maintain an action for damages. . . . The measure of damages in such a case is the difference between the rental value of the premises involved and the rent which the lessee has agreed to pay, together with such special damages as may have directly and necessarily occasioned to the lessee by the lessor’s wrongful act. . . . Thus, we must examine the wrongful acts of defendant and determine whether they directly and necessarily occasioned the damages awarded, keeping in mind that a trial court’s assessment of damages will be set aside only if it is manifestly erroneous. (Citations omitted.) 387 N.E.2d at 755.</p>
</blockquote>
<p><strong><span style="color: #1897ab;">PRACTICE POINTER</span></strong></p>
<p><span style="color: #1897ab;">Generally speaking, a breach of a covenant of quiet enjoyment is a breach of a contractual covenant contained (or implied) in a lease, constituting a cause of action against a landlord. If the “material annoyance, inconvenience, discomfort, or hurt” is caused by a nearby property owner or cotenant, the proper cause of action against such adjacent property owner or cotenant is likely “maintaining a private nuisance” rather than a breach of any covenant of quiet enjoyment, since, under those circumstances, there is no privity of contract through which a “covenant” of any sort might arise.</span></p>
<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><span style="color: #1897ab;">LESSON LEARNED</span></h2>
<p>The covenant of quiet enjoyment, while implied in all leases, is a covenant often expressly stated in the so-called “standard boilerplate” provisions of a commercial lease. As a contract covenant, it can be modified and adapted to the needs of the landlord and tenant by appropriate and careful drafting. Had the landlord in Blue Cross Ass’n, supra, included in the lease appropriate language granting it the right to enter upon and penetrate the tenant’s space for the purpose of installing plumbing, ventilation and electrical risers as determined by landlord to be reasonably necessary for the build-out and use of other portions of the building, no breach of the covenant of quiet enjoyment would have likely occurred. As noted by the court, a breach of the covenant of quiet enjoyment requires an intentional interference with a tenant’s full enjoyment and use of the leased premises which interference is unreasonable, unwarranted or unlawful. If the lease had included a suitable clause or provision expressly permitting the landlord to penetrate a portion of the leased space to install plumbing, ventilation, electrical risers and other systems to serve other portions of the building, no breach of the covenant of quiet enjoyment would have occurred.</p>
<blockquote class="wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow">
<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><span style="color: #1897ab;">AUTHOR’S NOTE</span></h2>
<p>If you are a property owner/developer planning to reconfigure a multi-tenant commercial property, or planning an adaptive reuse of commercial property encumbered with existing leases, proper due diligence requires a close examination of existing leases to confirm your rights to implement your development plan. If there is a risk of violating the covenant of quiet enjoyment, a strategy to mitigate that risk should be developed as part of the overall development plan. Otherwise, you may find yourself unable to proceed with your development plan, as existing commercial tenants enjoin implementation to your potential extreme financial detriment.</p>
</blockquote>
<p><em>Thanks for listening,</em><br /><em>R. Kymn Harp and Catherine A. Cooke</em></p>
<div class="wp-block-image">
<figure class="alignleft"><a href="https://i0.wp.com/harp-onthis.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/RSP_LogoHD-3.jpg"><img data-recalc-dims="1" loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="300" height="109" data-attachment-id="1041" data-permalink="http://harp-onthis.com/illinois-llcs-the-asset-protection-advantage/rsp_logohd-3/" data-orig-file="https://i0.wp.com/harp-onthis.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/RSP_LogoHD-3.jpg?fit=963%2C350" data-orig-size="963,350" data-comments-opened="1" data-image-meta="{"aperture":"0","credit":"","camera":"","caption":"","created_timestamp":"0","copyright":"","focal_length":"0","iso":"0","shutter_speed":"0","title":"","orientation":"1"}" data-image-title="RSP_LogoHD (3)" data-image-description="" data-image-caption="" data-medium-file="https://i0.wp.com/harp-onthis.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/RSP_LogoHD-3.jpg?fit=300%2C109" data-large-file="https://i0.wp.com/harp-onthis.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/RSP_LogoHD-3.jpg?fit=963%2C350" src="https://i0.wp.com/harp-onthis.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/RSP_LogoHD-3.jpg?resize=300%2C109" alt="RSP_LogoHD (3)" class="wp-image-1041" srcset="https://i0.wp.com/harp-onthis.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/RSP_LogoHD-3.jpg?resize=300%2C109 300w, https://i0.wp.com/harp-onthis.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/RSP_LogoHD-3.jpg?w=963 963w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px" /></a></figure></div>
<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><span style="color: #1897ab;"><em>COMING UP . . .</em></span></h3>
<p>In Part 3 of this series, we will discuss <span style="color: #1897ab;"><em><strong>Constructive Eviction</strong></em></span>—including the rights and remedies available to a commercial tenant who is constructively evicted by its landlord.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
<wfw:commentRss>http://harp-onthis.com/commercial-landlord-tenant-part-2-the-covenant-of-quiet-enjoyment/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">1065</post-id> </item>
<item>
<title>Commercial Landlord-Tenant Issues – PART 1 – Getting it Right</title>
<link>http://harp-onthis.com/commercial-landlord-tenant-issues-part-1-getting-it-right/</link>
<comments>http://harp-onthis.com/commercial-landlord-tenant-issues-part-1-getting-it-right/#comments</comments>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kymn Harp]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2015 22:37:49 +0000</pubDate>
<category><![CDATA[Commercial Real Estate]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[Landlord-Tenant]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[White Papers]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[#CRE]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[commercial landlord]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[commercial landlord tenant]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[commercial leases]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[commercial real estate]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[commercial tenants]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[conducting due diligence]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[consequences]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[development]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[enforcement actions]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[industrial property]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[lease rights]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[real estate]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[rights to parking]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[what to look for]]></category>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://harp-onthis.com/?p=1052</guid>
<description><![CDATA[In March 2015, the Illinois Institute for Continuing Legal Education (“IICLE”) published its 2015 Edition practice handbook entitled: Commercial Landlord-Tenant Practice. To provide best-practice guidance to all Illinois attorneys, IICLE recruits experienced attorneys with relevant knowledge to write each handbook […]]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="wp-block-image">
<figure class="alignleft is-resized"><a href="https://i0.wp.com/harp-onthis.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/Harp-3_17_15-019.jpg"><img data-recalc-dims="1" loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="199" height="300" data-attachment-id="1145" data-permalink="http://harp-onthis.com/due-diligence-checklists-for-commercial-real-estate-transactions-3/harp-3_17_15-019/" data-orig-file="https://i0.wp.com/harp-onthis.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/Harp-3_17_15-019.jpg?fit=2848%2C4288" data-orig-size="2848,4288" data-comments-opened="1" data-image-meta="{"aperture":"9","credit":"","camera":"NIKON D300","caption":"","created_timestamp":"1426589698","copyright":"","focal_length":"52","iso":"200","shutter_speed":"0.008","title":"","orientation":"0"}" data-image-title="Harp 3_17_15-019" data-image-description="" data-image-caption="<p>R. Kymn Harp<br />
Robbins, Salomon & Patt, Ltd.</p>
" data-medium-file="https://i0.wp.com/harp-onthis.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/Harp-3_17_15-019.jpg?fit=199%2C300" data-large-file="https://i0.wp.com/harp-onthis.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/Harp-3_17_15-019.jpg?fit=680%2C1024" src="https://i0.wp.com/harp-onthis.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/Harp-3_17_15-019.jpg?resize=199%2C300" alt="R. Kymn Harp Robbins, Salomon & Patt, Ltd." class="wp-image-1145" style="width:175px;height:245px" srcset="https://i0.wp.com/harp-onthis.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/Harp-3_17_15-019.jpg?resize=199%2C300 199w, https://i0.wp.com/harp-onthis.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/Harp-3_17_15-019.jpg?resize=680%2C1024 680w, https://i0.wp.com/harp-onthis.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/Harp-3_17_15-019.jpg?w=2000 2000w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 199px) 100vw, 199px" /></a><figcaption class="wp-element-caption">R. Kymn Harp<br />Robbins, Salomon & Patt, Ltd.</figcaption></figure></div>
<div class="wp-block-image">
<figure class="alignleft"><a href="https://i0.wp.com/harp-onthis.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/Catherine-Cooke-Shareholder-at-RSP.jpg"><img data-recalc-dims="1" loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="175" height="245" data-attachment-id="1051" data-permalink="http://harp-onthis.com/commercial-landlord-tenant-issues-part-1-getting-it-right/catherine-cooke-shareholder-at-rsp/" data-orig-file="https://i0.wp.com/harp-onthis.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/Catherine-Cooke-Shareholder-at-RSP.jpg?fit=175%2C245" data-orig-size="175,245" data-comments-opened="1" data-image-meta="{"aperture":"9","credit":"","camera":"NIKON D7000","caption":"","created_timestamp":"1367319064","copyright":"","focal_length":"98","iso":"125","shutter_speed":"0.008","title":"","orientation":"1"}" data-image-title="Catherine Cooke" data-image-description="" data-image-caption="<p>Catherine Cooke<br />
Robbins, Salomon & Patt, Ltd.</p>
" data-medium-file="https://i0.wp.com/harp-onthis.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/Catherine-Cooke-Shareholder-at-RSP.jpg?fit=175%2C245" data-large-file="https://i0.wp.com/harp-onthis.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/Catherine-Cooke-Shareholder-at-RSP.jpg?fit=175%2C245" src="https://i0.wp.com/harp-onthis.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/Catherine-Cooke-Shareholder-at-RSP.jpg?resize=175%2C245" alt="Catherine Cook Shareholder at Robbins, Salomon & Patt, Ltd." class="wp-image-1051"/></a><figcaption class="wp-element-caption">Catherine Cooke<br /> Robbins, Salomon & Patt, Ltd.</figcaption></figure></div>
<p><em>In March 2015, the Illinois Institute for Continuing Legal Education (“IICLE”) published its 2015 Edition practice handbook entitled: <strong>Commercial Landlord-Tenant Practice.</strong> To provide best-practice guidance to all Illinois attorneys, IICLE recruits experienced attorneys with relevant knowledge to write each handbook chapter. For the current edition, IICLE asked R. Kymn Harp and Catherine Cooke of Robbins, Salomon & Patt, Ltd., Chicago, Illinois, to write the chapter entitled Tenant’s Duties, Rights and Remedies. We were, of course, pleased to oblige. Although each of us represent commercial landlords at least as often as we represent commercial tenants, a clear understanding of the duties, rights and remedies of commercial real estate tenants is critical when representing either side of the commercial lease transaction.</em></p>
<p><em>The following is an excerpt (slightly edited) from our chapter, Tenant’s Duties, Rights and Remedies appearing in the 2015 Edition of IICLE <strong>Commercial Landlord-Tenant Practice</strong>. We hope you find this excerpt, and the excerpts that will follow, informative and useful. Feel free to contact IICLE directly to purchase the entire volume.</em></p>
<h2 class="wp-block-heading">How Commercial Lease Issues Commonly Arise – Getting it Right</h2>
<div class="wp-block-image">
<figure class="alignright size-full is-resized"><img data-recalc-dims="1" loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="1000" height="667" data-attachment-id="1839" data-permalink="http://harp-onthis.com/commercial-landlord-tenant-issues-part-1-getting-it-right/successfuldealrealestateleaseorhomepurchaseconceptbuyer/" data-orig-file="https://i0.wp.com/harp-onthis.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/successful-deal-Real-estate-lease-or-home-purchase.jpg?fit=1000%2C667" data-orig-size="1000,667" data-comments-opened="1" data-image-meta="{"aperture":"0","credit":"Shutterstock","camera":"","caption":"","created_timestamp":"0","copyright":"Copyright (c) 2022 CrizzyStudio\/Shutterstock. No use without permission.","focal_length":"0","iso":"0","shutter_speed":"0","title":"Successful,Deal,Real,Estate,Lease,Or,Home,Purchase,Concept,Buyer","orientation":"1"}" data-image-title="Successful,Deal,Real,Estate,Lease,Or,Home,Purchase,Concept,Buyer" data-image-description="" data-image-caption="" data-medium-file="https://i0.wp.com/harp-onthis.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/successful-deal-Real-estate-lease-or-home-purchase.jpg?fit=300%2C200" data-large-file="https://i0.wp.com/harp-onthis.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/successful-deal-Real-estate-lease-or-home-purchase.jpg?fit=1000%2C667" src="https://i0.wp.com/harp-onthis.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/successful-deal-Real-estate-lease-or-home-purchase.jpg?resize=1000%2C667" alt="successful deal Real estate lease or home purchase" class="wp-image-1839" style="width:400px;height:267px" srcset="https://i0.wp.com/harp-onthis.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/successful-deal-Real-estate-lease-or-home-purchase.jpg?w=1000 1000w, https://i0.wp.com/harp-onthis.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/successful-deal-Real-estate-lease-or-home-purchase.jpg?resize=300%2C200 300w, https://i0.wp.com/harp-onthis.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/successful-deal-Real-estate-lease-or-home-purchase.jpg?resize=768%2C512 768w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 1000px) 100vw, 1000px" /></figure></div>
<p>Commercial real estate leases, like virtually all documents and agreements relating to commercial real estate transactions and interests, are, to a very large extent, consistent only in their variety. In commercial real estate practice, there are few, if any, “standard form” documents or agreements. To be sure, there are provisions in commercial real estate leases that any experienced practitioner would expect to see, and there are some generally applicable legal concepts that apply, but the variety of issues that may arise — and the language used in each commercial lease — will directly and materially impact the “duties, rights, and remedies” of a tenant under any commercial lease.</p>
<p>The best answer to most questions about what are the rights, duties, and remedies of a tenant under a commercial real estate lease is “It depends.” What does it depend on? It depends primarily on what the parties to the lease — the landlord and tenant — intended, as (presumably) reflected by the express terms and conditions of the lease. However, two common challenges frequently exist, and they apply equally to commercial tenants and commercial landlords. They are (a) poorly written lease provisions that do not clearly and definitively set forth the intention of the landlord and tenant in a way that cannot reasonably be misunderstood and (b) inclusion of perceived “standard boilerplate” provisions in a lease without fully understanding their legal or practical affect on the leased premises, the parties, and the greater project of which the leased premises may be a part. When the intent of the parties is not abundantly clear, a court may find the answer implied by the facts and circumstances.</p>
<h2 class="wp-block-heading">GENERAL LEASE PRINCIPLES AND RULES OF CONSTRUCTION</h2>
<p>A “lease” is generally described as a contract for exclusive possession of land and improvements for a term of years or other duration, usually for a specified rent or other compensation. <em>Urban Investment & Development Co. v. Maurice L. Rothschild & Co</em>., 25 Ill.App.3d 546, 323 N.E.2d 588, 592 (1st Dist. 1975); <em>Feeley v. Michigan Avenue National Bank</em>, 141 Ill.App.3d 187, 490 N.E.2d 15, 18, 141 Ill.Dec. 187 (1st Dist. 1986).</p>
<p>In determining the duties, rights, and remedies of a tenant under a commercial lease in Illinois, the general rules of contract construction will apply. <em>Walgreen Co. v. American National Bank & Trust Company of Chicago</em>, 4 Ill.App.3d 549, 281 N.E.2d 462, 465 (1st Dist. 1972); <em>Feeley, supra</em>, 490 N.E.2d at 18; <em>Chicago Title & Trust Co. v. Southland Corp</em>., 111 Ill.App.3d 67, 443 N.E.2d 294, 297, 66 Ill.Dec. 611 (1st Dist. 1982). Interpretation of a lease is a question of law when the terms are plain and unambiguous. <em>Madigan Bros. v. Melrose Shopping Center Co</em>., 123 Ill.App.3d 851, 463 N.E.2d 824, 828, 79 Ill.Dec. 270 (1st Dist. 1984).</p>
<p>“An ambiguous contract is one capable of being understood in more senses than one; an agreement obscure in meaning, through indefiniteness of expression, or having a double meaning.” <em>Advertising Checking Bureau, Inc. v. Canal-Randolph Associates</em>, 101 Ill.App.3d 140, 427 N.E.2d 1039, 1042, 56 Ill.Dec. 634 (1st Dist. 1991), quoting <em>First National Bank of Chicago v. Victor Comptometer Corp</em>., 123 Ill.App.2d 335, 260 N.E.2d 99, 102 (1st Dist. 1970). However, the mere fact that the parties to a lease “dispute” the meaning of a lease provision and assign conflicting interpretations does not render the provision “ambiguous.” <em>McGann v. Murry,</em> 75 Ill.App.3d 697, 393 N.E.2d 1339, 1342 – 1343, 31 Ill.Dec. 32 (3d Dist. 1979); <em>St. George Chicago, Inc. v. George J. Murges & Associates, Ltd</em>., 296 Ill.App.3d 285, 695 N.E.2d 503, 506 – 507, 230 Ill.Dec. 1013 (1st Dist. 1998); F<em>ord v. Dovenmuehle Mortgage, Inc</em>., 273 Ill.App.3d 240, 651 N.E.2d 751, 745 – 755, 209 Ill.Dec. 573 (1st Dist. 1995). Whether ambiguity exists is a question of law for the court. Advertising Checking Bureau, supra, 427 N.E.2d at 1042; Pioneer Trust & Savings Bank v. Lucky Stores, Inc., 91 Ill.App.3d 573, 414 N.E.2d 1152, 1154, 47 Ill.Dec. 36 (1st Dist. 1980).</p>
<p>It is well-settled in Illinois that, when construing a written lease, the court must give words their commonly accepted meaning and must construe every part with reference to all other portions of the lease “so that every part may stand, if possible, and no part of it, either in words or sentences, shall be regarded as superfluous or void if it can be prevented.” <em>Kokenes v. Cities Service Oil Co</em>., 24 Ill.App.3d 483, 321 N.E.2d 338, 340 (1st Dist. 1974), quoting <em>Szulerecki v. Oppenheimer,</em> 283 Ill. 525, 119 N.E. 643, 646 (1918). See also <em>Southland, supra</em>, 443 N.E.2d at 297.</p>
<p>In construing a lease, the instrument is to be considered as a whole and the primary object is to derive the intent of the parties. However, a contract must be enforced as written, and when the terms of a lease are clear and unambiguous, they will be given their natural and ordinary meaning. <em>Gerardi v. Vaal</em>, 169 Ill.App.3d 818, 523 N.E.2d 1327, 1331, 120 Ill.Dec. 416 (3d Dist. 1988).</p>
<p>The foregoing sounds pretty straightforward, but unless attorneys and their clients draft leases with a comprehensive understanding of the interplay between particularly drafted provisions and every other part of the lease — including so-called “standard boilerplate” provisions — they may find themselves surprised by what they have “agreed to.”</p>
<blockquote class="wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow">
<h3 class="wp-block-heading">PRACTICE POINTER</h3>
<p> Drafting a commercial real estate lease is similar to drafting any other commercial document, except that the meaning and intent of contractual lease provisions are colored by an extensive body of underlying real property law that has developed over the centuries.</p>
<p>A commercial real estate lease should say what the parties mean and mean what it says. Words have meaning; phrases have meaning; each provision has meaning. The interplay of words, phrases, and all provisions in a lease will help determine the meaning of each other word, phrase, or provision. See <em>Kokenes, supra</em>, 321 N.E.2d at 340; <em>Szulerecki, supra</em>, 119 N.E. at 646.</p>
<h3 class="wp-block-heading">PRACTICE POINTER</h3>
<p> Be sure the words and phrases you use mean what your client believes they mean before proceeding.</p>
<p> If there are provisions of a commercial real estate lease you do not fully understand — including provisions you believe are “standard boilerplate” provisions — you need to learn what they mean and how they affect other parts of the lease, and your client’s rights, duties and remedies, before advising your client to proceed.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>The following discussion highlights some areas in which the rights, duties, and remedies of the commercial real estate tenant (and, by mirror image, the landlord) appear not to have been what one or the other party thought they were.</p>
<span id="more-1052"></span>
<h2 class="wp-block-heading">LEASEHOLD EASEMENTS</h2>
<p>An easement creates an interest in land and must, therefore, be founded on a deed or other writing, or on prescription, which presumes a previous grant. <em>Brunotte v. De Witt</em>, 360 Ill. 518, 196 N.E. 489, 495 (1935); <em>The Fair v. Evergreen Park Shopping Center of Delaware</em>, 4 Ill.App.2d 454, 124 N.E.2d 649, 654 (1st Dist. 1954). It may be created by covenant or agreement as well as by grant, for such agreements are in legal effect grants. <em>Chicago Title & Trust Co. v. Wabash-Randolph Corp</em>., 384 Ill. 78, 51 N.E.2d 132, 136 (1943); <em>D.M. Goodwillie Co. v. Commonwealth Electric Co.</em>, 241 Ill. 42, 89 N.E. 272, 283 (1909); <em>The Fair, supra</em>, 124 N.E.2d at 654.</p>
<p>“No particular words are necessary to constitute a grant, and any words which clearly show the intention to give an easement, which is by law grantable, are sufficient to effect that purpose.” <em>Wabash-Randolph, supra</em>, 51 N.E.2d at 136. See also <em>The Fair, supra</em>, 124 N.E.2d at 654. The agreement must be construed so as to carry out the plain intent of the parties. <em>Barber v. Allen</em>, 212 Ill. 125, 72 N.E. 33, 36 (1904).</p>
<h3 class="wp-block-heading">A. Parking</h3>
<p>Parking rights are fertile ground for disputes between commercial tenants and landlords. A significant source of litigation is imprecise drafting, which can result in the creation of implied easements having a scope larger than the developer intended.</p>
<div class="wp-block-image">
<figure class="alignleft"><a href="https://i0.wp.com/harp-onthis.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/dreamstimemedium_29466233.jpg"><img data-recalc-dims="1" loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="300" height="228" data-attachment-id="519" data-permalink="http://harp-onthis.com/commercial-real-estate-development-life-lessons-and-residential-neighbors/httpwww-dreamstime-comstock-photos-walking-shopping-center-image29466233/" data-orig-file="https://i0.wp.com/harp-onthis.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/dreamstimemedium_29466233.jpg?fit=1982%2C1512" data-orig-size="1982,1512" data-comments-opened="1" data-image-meta="{"aperture":"0","credit":"","camera":"","caption":"","created_timestamp":"0","copyright":"(c) Amsis1 | Dreamstime.com","focal_length":"0","iso":"0","shutter_speed":"0","title":"http:\/\/www.dreamstime.com\/stock-photos-walking-shopping-center-image29466233"}" data-image-title="http://www.dreamstime.com/stock-photos-walking-shopping-center-image29466233" data-image-description="" data-image-caption="" data-medium-file="https://i0.wp.com/harp-onthis.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/dreamstimemedium_29466233.jpg?fit=300%2C228" data-large-file="https://i0.wp.com/harp-onthis.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/dreamstimemedium_29466233.jpg?fit=1024%2C781" src="https://i0.wp.com/harp-onthis.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/dreamstimemedium_29466233.jpg?resize=300%2C228" alt="http://www.dreamstime.com/stock-photos-walking-shopping-center-image29466233" class="wp-image-519" srcset="https://i0.wp.com/harp-onthis.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/dreamstimemedium_29466233.jpg?resize=300%2C228 300w, https://i0.wp.com/harp-onthis.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/dreamstimemedium_29466233.jpg?resize=1024%2C781 1024w, https://i0.wp.com/harp-onthis.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/dreamstimemedium_29466233.jpg?resize=393%2C300 393w, https://i0.wp.com/harp-onthis.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/dreamstimemedium_29466233.jpg?w=1982 1982w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px" /></a></figure></div>
<p>As illustrated in the cases discussed below, the law in Illinois is that when the landlord makes no reservation of the right to alter the common areas in the lease, and when the site plan attached to the lease accurately and clearly delineates the common areas, the tenant has an easement in the particular configuration of common space delineated by the lease and plats.</p>
<h4 class="wp-block-heading">1. Shopping Center Parking</h4>
<p>– In <em>Madigan Bros. v. Melrose Shopping Center Co</em>., 123 Ill.App.3d 851, 463 N.E.2d 824, 79 Ill.Dec. 270 (1st Dist. 1984), a shopping center tenant sought a permanent injunction to prevent a landlord from constructing a restaurant or other building in the shopping center’s parking area, without consent of the tenant.</p>
<p>The lease included a provision that stated:</p>
<blockquote class="wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow">
<p>this lease includes the non-exclusive right to Tenant and its agents, servants, successors, assigns, licensees, invitees, customers, suppliers and patrons to use and enjoy throughout the term of this lease the “common areas” of the Shopping Center, to-wit, the driveways, entrances, exits, roadways, parking areas, sidewalks, malls and other features and facilities provided for the general uses and purposes of the Shopping Center. 463 N.E.2d at 826.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>The lease further provided: “The location and arrangement of said parking areas, sidewalks, pedestrian malls, entrances and exits and roadways will substantially conform with the plat attached hereto and shall be kept open at all times<em>.</em>” <em>Id.</em></p>
<p>Additionally, the lease provided that the landlord would provide, operate, manage, and maintain all parking areas “together with any enlargement or rearrangement thereof required by enlarging the Shopping Center” and provided that the tenant shall “have, hold and enjoy the demised premises and the entire . . . building together with all other improvements and all easements, rights and appurtenances which are a part of the demised premises during the full term the lease and any extensions thereof, without hindrance or ejection by any persons lawfully claiming under Landlord.” <em>Id.</em></p>
<p>Attached to the lease as exhibits were (a) a plot plan of the shopping center showing the leased space; (b) a legal description of the shopping center; and (c) an exhibit showing “the number and area of existing and proposed automobile parking spaces in the Shopping Center together with existing and proposed driveways, entrances, exits and roadways.” Id. The third exhibit was subsequently amended to show the exact location of the parking area and indicate the specific number of parking spaces being provided in the shopping center. The lease was also amended to permit the landlord to construct a bank in the parking area in return for the landlord waiving a restriction against the tenant opening a new store within four miles of the shopping center.</p>
<p>The tenant sought to enjoin the landlord’s construction of the restaurant or other buildings in the shopping center’s parking area, claiming the lease created for the benefit of the tenant a nonexclusive easement in and to the shopping center parking areas. The landlord denied that the tenant had any easement rights under the lease and otherwise denied interfering with any of tenant’s rights under its lease. The landlord claimed that the landlord had reserved the right to make changes to the location or configuration of the parking areas and that the lease required only that the landlord maintain the specified ratio of parking spaces to leasable area, which would be done under the landlord’s construction plan.</p>
<p>The court held that the lease was clear and unambiguous in granting the tenant the use and enjoyment of the shopping center’s parking facilities. The court stated that “[t]he principal function of a court in construing a written contract is to discern and to give effect to the intention of the parties as expressed in the language of the document when read as a whole” and that “[w]hen the terms of a contract are clear and unambiguous, they must be enforced.” 463 N.E.2d at 828.</p>
<p>After considering the documents presented, the court concluded that the intent of the parties was to grant the shopping center tenants an easement in the parking areas for ingress, egress, and parking, as set out in the site plan, noting, “[i]t is the law in Illinois that where no reservation by the landlord of the right to alter the common areas is made in the lease and where the site plan attached to the lease accurately and precisely delineates the common areas, the tenant has an easement to the particular configuration of common space delineated by the lease and attached plats.” Id.</p>
<p>– In <em>Walgreen Co. v. America National Bank & Trust Company of Chicago,</em> 4 Ill.App.3d 549, 281 N.E.2d 462 (1st Dist. 1972), Walgreens was a tenant in the Village Green Shopping Center in Park Ridge. Walgreens filed an action to enjoin the landlord and Fotomat from permitting or causing construction of a structure of any kind in the parking area. In particular, Walgreens sought to enjoin the erection of an approximately 40-square-foot kiosk within an area comprising roughly three parking spaces that was to be operated by Fotomat for the sale of photographic equipment and supplies and for film processing. The trial court granted the injunction requested by Walgreens, and the landlord appealed. The principal issue on appeal was whether the landlord breached its lease with Walgreens by leasing an area in the parking lot of the shopping center to Fotomat for construction of a kiosk.</p>
<p>Article 7(a) of the lease to Walgreens provided in part as follows:</p>
<blockquote class="wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow">
<p>It is an express condition of this lease that at all times during the continuance of this lease, Landlord shall provide, maintain, repair, adequately light when necessary during Tenant’s business hours, clean, supervise and keep available the Parking Areas as shown on the attached plan (which Parking Areas shall contain at least 150,000 square feet and shall provide for the parking of at least 400 automobiles), and also adequate service areas, pedestrian malls, sidewalks, curbs, roadways and other facilities appurtenant thereto. Said Parking Areas shall be for the free and exclusive use of customers, invitees and employees of Tenant and of other occupants of said Shopping Center, shall have suitable automobile entrances and exits from and to adjacent streets and roads, shall be level and shall be suitably paved and pitched to streets for surface water run off. 281 N.E.2d at 465.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>The lease provided that Walgreens would pay its proportionate share of costs for operating and maintaining the parking facilities in proportion to the relative square footage of the Walgreens to the total area of all retail facilities in the shopping center. Also, Walgreens was not obligated to open its store or pay rent until “[a]ll the parking and other facilities described in Article 7 have been completed, paved and lighted and are available for use.”<em> Id</em>.</p>
<p>The Fotomat kiosk was to be placed in a part of the shopping center designated on the plan attached to the Walgreens lease as a parking lot. It was designed to serve customers who drove up on either side of it in a motor vehicle. The kiosk was to have dimensions of 9 feet × 4½ feet, eliminating three parking spaces. Even with the elimination of the three parking spaces, the parking lot would still have in excess of 150,000 square feet and sufficient space for more than 400 parking spaces.</p>
<p>The landlord claimed that the plot plan attached to the Walgreens lease was only descriptive and illustrative, since Article 7(a), by stating “which Parking Areas shall contain at least 150,000 square feet and shall [provide for the parking of] at least 400 automobiles,” set forth the landlord’s contractual obligation. 281 N.E.2d at 466. The landlord argued that there was no other way to give meaning and effect to this language in Article 7(a) that specified the minimum square footage of the parking area and minimum number of parking spaces.</p>
<p>The court held that the rules of contract construction apply to written leases and that</p>
<blockquote class="wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow">
<p>(t)he principal function of a court in construing a written agreement is to discern and to give effect to the intention of the parties as expressed in the language of the document when read as a whole. . . . A court cannot remake a contract and give a litigant a better bargain than he himself was satisfied to make; and when the terms of a contract are clear and unambiguous, they must be enforced. (Citations omitted.) <em>Id</em>.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>The court noted that “the lessor foresaw the possibility of a need to expand the retail facilities and as a part of the plot plan reserved the right to rearrange interior walls of one of the buildings in the shopping center, and in addition it reserved the right to expand the retail establishments into two specified areas. No provision, however, was made for diminishing the designated number of parking lots.” 281 N.E.2d at 467.</p>
<p>The court found from the language in the lease and the attached plot plan that the lease was clear and unambiguous. “The plot plan set forth with exactitude the location of the retail facilities, the pedestrian mall, the sidewalks, the roadways, the service drives, the parking areas, and 463 parking places.” Id.</p>
<p>The lease provided under Article 7(b) that Walgreens was to pay its proportionate share of costs to operate and maintain the parking lots and under Article 7(a) that the customers, invitees, and employees of Walgreens and other shopping center tenants were to be given free and exclusive use of the parking areas. After considering the evidence presented, the court concluded that the lease granted Walgreens and other tenants in the shopping center “an easement in the parking areas for ingress, egress, and parking as set out in the plan” and upheld the injunction against constructing the Fotomat kiosk. Id.</p>
<h4 class="wp-block-heading">2. Office Building Parking</h4>
<div class="wp-block-image">
<figure class="alignleft"><a href="https://i0.wp.com/harp-onthis.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/dreamstime_m_5364405.jpg"><img data-recalc-dims="1" loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="300" height="150" data-attachment-id="512" data-permalink="http://harp-onthis.com/section-1031-like-kind-exchanges-part-1-of-3/httpwww-dreamstime-comroyalty-free-stock-photo-residential-commercial-buildings-image5364405/" data-orig-file="https://i0.wp.com/harp-onthis.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/dreamstime_m_5364405.jpg?fit=3000%2C1500" data-orig-size="3000,1500" data-comments-opened="1" data-image-meta="{"aperture":"0","credit":"","camera":"","caption":"","created_timestamp":"0","copyright":"(c) Ptoone | Dreamstime.com","focal_length":"0","iso":"0","shutter_speed":"0","title":"http:\/\/www.dreamstime.com\/royalty-free-stock-photo-residential-commercial-buildings-image5364405"}" data-image-title="http://www.dreamstime.com/royalty-free-stock-photo-residential-commercial-buildings-image5364405" data-image-description="" data-image-caption="" data-medium-file="https://i0.wp.com/harp-onthis.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/dreamstime_m_5364405.jpg?fit=300%2C150" data-large-file="https://i0.wp.com/harp-onthis.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/dreamstime_m_5364405.jpg?fit=1024%2C512" src="https://i0.wp.com/harp-onthis.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/dreamstime_m_5364405.jpg?resize=300%2C150" alt="http://www.dreamstime.com/royalty-free-stock-photo-residential-commercial-buildings-image5364405" class="wp-image-512" srcset="https://i0.wp.com/harp-onthis.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/dreamstime_m_5364405.jpg?resize=300%2C150 300w, https://i0.wp.com/harp-onthis.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/dreamstime_m_5364405.jpg?resize=1024%2C512 1024w, https://i0.wp.com/harp-onthis.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/dreamstime_m_5364405.jpg?resize=500%2C250 500w, https://i0.wp.com/harp-onthis.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/dreamstime_m_5364405.jpg?w=2000 2000w, https://i0.wp.com/harp-onthis.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/dreamstime_m_5364405.jpg?w=3000 3000w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px" /></a></figure></div>
<p>In <em>Mutual of Omaha Life Insurance Co. v. Executive Plaza, Inc.</em>, 99 Ill.App.3d 190, 425 N.E.2d 503, 54 Ill.Dec. 638 (2d Dist. 1981), the tenants in a multistory commercial office building sued the manager and owner for breach of parking rights provisions in a lease. At the time of execution of the lease, a parking lot was provided adjacent to the office building, consisting of approximately 148 spaces for use by all tenants in the building and their clients. The parking lot had five points of ingress and egress: two on North Court Street (a two-way street) and one each on Park Street and Locust Street (two-way streets) and North Church Street (a one-way street). Parking was available to the general public on three of the five streets.</p>
<p>Subsequently, the landlord entered into a lease with Coopers and Lybrand (C & L) for 27 percent of the total rentable area. As part of the C & L lease, the landlord granted C & L employees exclusive access and use of 32 parking spaces in the previously existing common parking lot and an additional 18 spaces in a newly constructed parking lot on Locust Street across from the premises. The restricted parking areas were cordoned off by chains, and access to the restricted parking areas was controlled by plastic pass cards inserted into a gate mechanism to raise a gate. The access gate to the 32 restricted parking spaces in the former common lot was one of the two access points on North Court Street previously providing common access to the common parking lot.</p>
<p>The trial court ruled that the lease had been breached by partially restricting access to parking that was required under the lease to be available to all tenants, but concluded that removal of the parking restriction would not solve the claimed harm of inconvenience, that no direct economic or money loss to tenants had been proved, and that injunctive relief was not appropriate under these circumstances. The tenants appealed.</p>
<p>The appellate court reversed the ruling of the trial court and held: “The rule in Illinois is now clearly that language such as we have in the lease in question creates an easement appurtenant over a parking area in a shopping center, and this is the law elsewhere as well.” 425 N.E.2d at 507. Although the parties did not cite any authorities that specifically applied the rules that have developed in the shopping center cases (see §9.5 above) to parking appurtenant to an office building, the court determined that there was “no logical basis for having one set of rules for shopping centers and a different set of rules for other contractual relationships.”<em> Id</em>., quoting <em>Crest Commercial, Inc. v. Union-Hall, Inc</em>., 104 Ill.App.2d 110, 118, 243 N.E.2d 652, 657 (2d Dist. 1968).</p>
<p>The court noted:</p>
<blockquote class="wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow">
<p>It might, of course, be argued that the furnishing of customer parking is absolutely essential to the tenants’ business in a shopping center whereas parking in connection with the less competitive setting of an office building a mere convenience. . . However, here the tenants have been found to have an easement appurtenant by express contract and from that contractual relationship it follows, in our opinion, that the use of the appurtenant parking areas may not be reduced or substantially altered during the term of the lease. (Citation omitted.) Id.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>The court went on to state that “the grant of an easement appurtenant as found by the trial court is a proper subject of mandatory injunction even if only minor interference is shown.” 425 N.E.2d at 507 – 508, citing <em>Ogilby v. Donaldson’s Floors, Inc</em>., 13 Ill.2d 305, 148 N.E.2d 758, 760 – 761 (1958). The court noted that to show irreparable injury, a party is not required to show that the injury is beyond the possibility of compensation, nor must the injury be very great, and “the fact that no actual damages could be proved and the jury could award only nominal damages ‘often furnishes the very best reason why a court of equity should interfere.’ ” 425 N.E.2d at 508, quoting <em>Newell v. Sass</em>, 142 Ill. 104, 31 N.E. 176, 180 (1892).</p>
<h3 class="wp-block-heading">PRACTICE POINTER</h3>
<blockquote class="wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow">
<p> If a commercial lease describes available parking — and especially if it makes reference to a plot plan/site plan that delineates the location of buildings, roads, parking, curb cuts, etc. — and the landlord thereafter attempts to alter the parking or access rights without a clear and unequivocal right to do so, the tenant will have a legal right to assert a breach of lease and obtain a mandatory injunction to prevent the change, or require that the <em>status quo ante</em> be restored. For the landlord to avoid this outcome, it is important to provide in the lease an express reservation of the right to alter existing or planned parking at the landlord’s discretion, if that is the landlord’s intent.</p>
</blockquote>
<h4 class="wp-block-heading">B. Obstruction and Reduction of Passageways</h4>
<p>Construction of a glass bay entrance to a tenant’s store in a shopping center that extended five feet beyond the building lines depicted on a site plan attached to other tenant leases, and which disrupted sightlines to adjacent stores, was found to constitute an unpermitted obstruction or reduction of a private passageway created by the site plan. <em>The Fair v. Evergreen Park Shopping Plaza of Delaware, Inc</em>., 4 Ill.App.2d 454, 124 N.E.2d 649, 652 (1st Dist. 1954).</p>
<p>The court found that when a right of passageway is granted over a strip of land having definite boundaries, the right extends over the full width of the tract described. The Fair (a major tenant facing the mall in the shopping center) was entitled to use the entire mall. The court concluded that the injury was a continuing one, and because there was no adequate remedy at law, “the remedy for the obstruction or reduction of a private passageway is by injunction.” 124 N.E.2d at 656, citing <em>Carpenter v. Capital Electric Co.</em>, 178 Ill. 29, 52 N.E. 973, 975 (1899).</p>
<h4 class="wp-block-heading">C. Building Corridors</h4>
<p>As with parking rights, a floor plan attached to a lease may establish an implied easement in favor of tenants that would bar the landlord from relocating corridors reflected on the floor plan; however, express language in the lease clearly permitting a landlord to relocate the corridors will overcome any contrary implication arising from the floor plan. <em>Advertising Checking Bureau, Inc. v. Canal-Randolph Associates,</em> 101 Ill.App.3d 140, 427 N.E.2d 1039, 1042 – 1043, 56 Ill.Dec. 634 (1st Dist. 1991).</p>
<div class="wp-block-image">
<figure class="aligncenter"><a href="https://i0.wp.com/harp-onthis.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/RSP_LogoFull_2PMS.jpg"><img data-recalc-dims="1" loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="300" height="109" data-attachment-id="283" data-permalink="http://harp-onthis.com/about/rsp_logofull_2pms/" data-orig-file="https://i0.wp.com/harp-onthis.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/RSP_LogoFull_2PMS.jpg?fit=963%2C350" data-orig-size="963,350" data-comments-opened="1" data-image-meta="{"aperture":"0","credit":"","camera":"","caption":"","created_timestamp":"0","copyright":"","focal_length":"0","iso":"0","shutter_speed":"0","title":""}" data-image-title="RSP_LogoFull_2PMS" data-image-description="" data-image-caption="" data-medium-file="https://i0.wp.com/harp-onthis.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/RSP_LogoFull_2PMS.jpg?fit=300%2C109" data-large-file="https://i0.wp.com/harp-onthis.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/RSP_LogoFull_2PMS.jpg?fit=963%2C350" src="https://i0.wp.com/harp-onthis.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/RSP_LogoFull_2PMS.jpg?resize=300%2C109" alt="RSP_LogoFull_2PMS" class="wp-image-283" srcset="https://i0.wp.com/harp-onthis.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/RSP_LogoFull_2PMS.jpg?resize=300%2C109 300w, https://i0.wp.com/harp-onthis.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/RSP_LogoFull_2PMS.jpg?resize=500%2C181 500w, https://i0.wp.com/harp-onthis.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/RSP_LogoFull_2PMS.jpg?w=963 963w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px" /></a></figure></div>
<p><em>COMING UP . . .<br /></em></p>
<p>We hope you have found the foregoing discussion useful. Coming up, in <strong>Part 2</strong> of this series, we will discuss the often misunderstood leasehold “<em><strong>Covenant of Quite Enjoyment”</strong></em> in the context of commercial leases.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
<wfw:commentRss>http://harp-onthis.com/commercial-landlord-tenant-issues-part-1-getting-it-right/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">1052</post-id> </item>
<item>
<title>Illinois LLCs – The Asset Protection Advantage</title>
<link>http://harp-onthis.com/illinois-llcs-the-asset-protection-advantage/</link>
<comments>http://harp-onthis.com/illinois-llcs-the-asset-protection-advantage/#respond</comments>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kymn Harp]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2015 21:29:21 +0000</pubDate>
<category><![CDATA[Asset Protection]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[Commercial Real Estate]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[White Papers]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[#CRE]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[Advantage]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[asset protection]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[business]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[Chicago]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[choice of entity]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[commercial real estate]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[corporation v. LLC]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[defense]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[development]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[enforcement actions]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[Illinois LLC]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[industrial property]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[investment]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[keys to closing]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[limited liability company]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[LLC]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[loan workouts]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[manager managed LLC]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[purchase]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[transactions]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[what to look for]]></category>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://harp-onthis.com/?p=1039</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Illinois LLCs – The Asset Protection Advantage A Technical Analysis Among sophisticated investors and other high-asset/high-net worth individuals and businesses, the topic of “asset protection” is bound to arise. As many became painfully aware during the recent Great Recession, bad […]]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<h1 class="wp-block-heading">Illinois LLCs – The Asset Protection Advantage</h1>
<h2 class="wp-block-heading">A Technical Analysis</h2>
<p>Among sophisticated investors and other high-asset/high-net worth individuals and businesses, the topic of “<em>asset protection</em>” is bound to arise. As many became painfully aware during the recent <em>Great Recession</em>, bad things can happen to good people. In my article <a title="Asset Protection – Lessons Learned" href="http://harp-onthis.com/asset-protection-lessons-learned/" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><em>Asset Protection – Lessons Learned</em></a>, I discussed how properly structuring one’s holdings could have prevented, or at least mitigated, much of the financial devastation and anguish experienced by business owners, investors, real estate developers, doctors and others caught off-guard by the drastic economic collapse of 2007-2010.</p>
<div class="wp-block-image">
<figure class="alignleft"><a href="https://i0.wp.com/harp-onthis.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/RSP_LogoFull_2PMS.jpg"><img data-recalc-dims="1" loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="300" height="109" data-attachment-id="283" data-permalink="http://harp-onthis.com/about/rsp_logofull_2pms/" data-orig-file="https://i0.wp.com/harp-onthis.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/RSP_LogoFull_2PMS.jpg?fit=963%2C350" data-orig-size="963,350" data-comments-opened="1" data-image-meta="{"aperture":"0","credit":"","camera":"","caption":"","created_timestamp":"0","copyright":"","focal_length":"0","iso":"0","shutter_speed":"0","title":""}" data-image-title="RSP_LogoFull_2PMS" data-image-description="" data-image-caption="" data-medium-file="https://i0.wp.com/harp-onthis.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/RSP_LogoFull_2PMS.jpg?fit=300%2C109" data-large-file="https://i0.wp.com/harp-onthis.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/RSP_LogoFull_2PMS.jpg?fit=963%2C350" src="https://i0.wp.com/harp-onthis.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/RSP_LogoFull_2PMS.jpg?resize=300%2C109" alt="RSP_LogoFull_2PMS" class="wp-image-283" srcset="https://i0.wp.com/harp-onthis.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/RSP_LogoFull_2PMS.jpg?resize=300%2C109 300w, https://i0.wp.com/harp-onthis.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/RSP_LogoFull_2PMS.jpg?resize=500%2C181 500w, https://i0.wp.com/harp-onthis.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/RSP_LogoFull_2PMS.jpg?w=963 963w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px" /></a></figure></div>
<p>Often, there is confusion about what the term <em>asset protection</em> really means. Some imagine a shadowy network of off-shore trusts and secret bank accounts in foreign lands set up by unscrupulous characters to cheat innocent creditors. This is simply not true. In this article I will not debate the claimed pros and cons of secret bank accounts and so-called <em>off-shore asset protection trusts</em>. I will say, however, that under most circumstances, they don’t work for U.S. citizens residing in the U.S.A.</p>
<div class="wp-block-image">
<figure class="alignright size-full is-resized"><img data-recalc-dims="1" loading="lazy" decoding="async" data-attachment-id="1841" data-permalink="http://harp-onthis.com/illinois-llcs-the-asset-protection-advantage/lifeinsurance-familyprotectionfinancialconceptbroker/" data-orig-file="https://i0.wp.com/harp-onthis.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/depicts-buying-protection-plan-for-safety.jpg?fit=1000%2C668" data-orig-size="1000,668" data-comments-opened="1" data-image-meta="{"aperture":"0","credit":"Shutterstock","camera":"","caption":"","created_timestamp":"0","copyright":"Copyright (c) 2020 William Potter\/Shutterstock. No use without permission.","focal_length":"0","iso":"0","shutter_speed":"0","title":"Life,Insurance,\/,Family,Protection,,Financial,Concept,:,Broker,\/","orientation":"1"}" data-image-title="Life,Insurance,/,Family,Protection,,Financial,Concept,:,Broker,/" data-image-description="" data-image-caption="" data-medium-file="https://i0.wp.com/harp-onthis.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/depicts-buying-protection-plan-for-safety.jpg?fit=300%2C200" data-large-file="https://i0.wp.com/harp-onthis.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/depicts-buying-protection-plan-for-safety.jpg?fit=1000%2C668" src="https://i0.wp.com/harp-onthis.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/depicts-buying-protection-plan-for-safety.jpg?resize=400%2C265" alt="depicts buying protection plan for safety" class="wp-image-1841" width="400" height="265" srcset="https://i0.wp.com/harp-onthis.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/depicts-buying-protection-plan-for-safety.jpg?resize=300%2C200 300w, https://i0.wp.com/harp-onthis.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/depicts-buying-protection-plan-for-safety.jpg?zoom=2&resize=400%2C265 800w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 400px) 100vw, 400px" /></figure></div>
<p>Legitimate asset protection is nothing more or less than properly ordering one’s business and financial affairs in a way that does not unnecessarily expose all assets to claims of creditors.</p>
<p>The right of persons and businesses to limit their liability and exposure of their assets to claims of creditors is the well settled in the U.S.A. The United States of America, and each individual state, has a plethora of laws authorizing and recognizing the legitimacy of corporations and other limited liability entities as a means by which an investor can segregate assets and limit exposure to liability.</p>
<p>No person has a legal or moral obligation to structure his or her affairs in a way that makes it easy for a creditor of one business or professional enterprise to attach assets of the investor not committed to that enterprise. This protection may be impinged if the person or business engages in conduct tantamount to fraud, but actions explicitly authorized by applicable statute can hardly be characterized as being fraudulent. Fraud is an intentional tort requiring, among other elements, intentional breach of a duty owed to the person claimed to be harmed. If a statute expressly authorizes conduct, it implicitly, if not explicitly, negates any duty to act in a manner contrary to that authorized by the statute.</p>
<p>This article presents a technical analysis of certain asset protection attributes of an Illinois limited liability company expressly authorized by the Illinois Limited Liability Company Act, 805 ILCS 180/1-1 <em>et seq</em> (the “Illinois LLC Act”). The remarkably robust asset protection value of an Illinois limited liability company is measured by two key attributes:</p>
<p>1. The ability, expressly authorized by the Illinois LLC Act, to include in an LLC operating agreement provisions that protect the limited liability company and its business and assets from claims owed to others by members of the LLC – an attribute that creates a huge advantage vs. a corporation, as discussed in Part I, below; and</p>
<p>2. Enhanced protection of Members and Managers from liability for debts, contracts and torts incurred by the LLC, or resulting from acts or omissions of a Member or Manager while acting on behalf of the LLC, to an extent measurably greater than the protection afforded officers, directors and shareholders of a corporation.</p>
<p>Although one might reasonably expect that the order in which these key attributes are discussed would be reversed, the Part I discussion precedes the Part II discussion because the matters to be discussed in Part I are best considered at the outset, when the operating agreement is being drafted; while the matters discussed in Part II will most directly apply later, once a judgment creditor is seeking to enforce its judgment.</p>
<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><span style="text-decoration: underline;">PART I</span>: Key Statutory Provisions to Consider When Drafting the Operating Agreement</h3>
<span id="more-1039"></span>
<p>A limited liability company is typically governed by two main sources of governing authority. First and foremost, the enabling statute which authorizes the creation of a limited liability company and establishes its legal characteristics. Second, the organizational documents, including, in Illinois, the Articles of Organization, and an internal document governing the limited liability company’s ownership and management, known as an “operating agreement”.</p>
<p>To gain the full asset protection value afforded to an Illinois limited liability company, it is necessary to pay close attention to the powers expressly authorized by the Illinois LLC Act, and to strategically draft the operating agreement in a manner that utilizes those asset protection benefits expressly permitted by the Illinois LLC Act.</p>
<h4 class="wp-block-heading"><a href="https://i0.wp.com/harp-onthis.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/RSP_LogoHD-3.jpg"><img data-recalc-dims="1" loading="lazy" decoding="async" data-attachment-id="1041" data-permalink="http://harp-onthis.com/illinois-llcs-the-asset-protection-advantage/rsp_logohd-3/" data-orig-file="https://i0.wp.com/harp-onthis.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/RSP_LogoHD-3.jpg?fit=963%2C350" data-orig-size="963,350" data-comments-opened="1" data-image-meta="{"aperture":"0","credit":"","camera":"","caption":"","created_timestamp":"0","copyright":"","focal_length":"0","iso":"0","shutter_speed":"0","title":"","orientation":"1"}" data-image-title="RSP_LogoHD (3)" data-image-description="" data-image-caption="" data-medium-file="https://i0.wp.com/harp-onthis.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/RSP_LogoHD-3.jpg?fit=300%2C109" data-large-file="https://i0.wp.com/harp-onthis.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/RSP_LogoHD-3.jpg?fit=963%2C350" class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-1041" src="https://i0.wp.com/harp-onthis.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/RSP_LogoHD-3.jpg?resize=300%2C109" alt="RSP_LogoHD (3)" width="300" height="109" srcset="https://i0.wp.com/harp-onthis.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/RSP_LogoHD-3.jpg?resize=300%2C109 300w, https://i0.wp.com/harp-onthis.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/RSP_LogoHD-3.jpg?w=963 963w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px" /></a></h4>
<h4 class="wp-block-heading"> </h4>
<h4 class="wp-block-heading"> </h4>
<h4 class="wp-block-heading">A. Key Sections to Consider.</h4>
<p>Seven sections of the Illinois LLC Act are of particular interest in terms of asset protection when drafting the operating agreement. A brief summary of these sections as they pertain to this discussion is as follows:</p>
<p><strong>805 ILCS 180/15-15</strong>. The factors a manager may take into consideration in discharging its duties as manager of the LLC are set forth in this section.</p>
<p><strong>805 ILCS 180/30-1</strong>. A member of an LLC is not a co-owner of the LLC’s property and has no transferable interest in the LLC’s property. The economic interest a member owns is called a “distributional interest,” which entitles the holder thereof to receive its share of any distributions made by the LLC.</p>
<p><strong>805 ILCS 180/30-5</strong>. A transfer of a distributional interest does not entitle the holder thereof to become or exercise any rights of a member. A transfer entitles the transferee to receive, to the extent transferred, only the distributions to which the transferor would be entitled.</p>
<p><strong>805 ILCS 180/30-10</strong>. A transferee may become a member only as permitted in accordance with the terms of the LLC operating agreement. A transferee who does not become a member is not entitled to participate in the management or conduct of the LLC’s business, and may not require access to information concerning LLC transactions, or inspect or copy any LLC records.</p>
<p><strong>805 ILCS 180/30-20</strong>. Sets forth the exclusive means by which a judgment creditor of a member or transferee may satisfy a judgment out of the judgment debtor’s distributional interest in an LLC.</p>
<p><strong>805 ILCS 180/35-1</strong>. On application of a transferee, asserting equitable grounds for dissolution, an LLC may be dissolved only upon a judicial determination that it is equitable to wind up the LLC’s business.</p>
<p><strong>805 ILCS 180/35-3</strong>. An operating agreement or the articles of organization may provide a means by which a new member can spring into existence, effective as of the date the last remaining member of the LLC becomes dissociated.</p>
<h4 class="wp-block-heading">B. The Asset Protection Advantage of Illinois LLCs vs. Corporations, Generally:</h4>
<p>As a general proposition, a judgment creditor with a judgment against a corporate shareholder can attach that shareholder’s shares to satisfy the judgment. After attachment, the judgment creditor becomes the owner of the shares, with the right to vote those shares (assuming they are voting shares) on matters calling for shareholder action, including election of the board of directors, sale of assets, etc. Some protection against this outcome can be gained by means of a shareholders’ agreement that restricts transferability of shares. If there is a single shareholder, however, or if a judgment is entered against all of the shareholders, the protection afforded by a shareholder agreement may be unavailable.</p>
<p>Under the Illinois LLC Act, the rights and remedies of a judgment creditor are substantially limited.</p>
<p>Section 30-20 of the Illinois LLC Act sets forth the exclusive remedy by which a judgment creditor of an LLC member or a member’s transferee may satisfy a judgment vis-à-vis the judgment debtor’s distributional interest in an LLC. The Illinois appellate court has confirmed the enforcement regime provided in §30-20. <em>Bank of America, N.A. v. Freed</em>, 2012 IL App (1st) 110749, ¶¶37 – 42, 983 N.E.2d 509.</p>
<p>Pursuant to §30-20 of the Illinois LLC Act:</p>
<p>A court may impose a charging order on the distributional interest of the judgment debtor. 805 ILCS 180/30-20(a).</p>
<p>A charging order creates a lien on the judgment debtor’s distributional interest. 805 ILCS 180/30-20(b).</p>
<p>A court may order foreclosure of the lien at any time, but the purchaser at the foreclosure sale has only the rights of a transferee. Id.</p>
<p>Section 30-10 of the Illinois LLC Act sets forth the scope of rights of a transferee. Unless provided otherwise in the operating agreement, the transferee does not become a member of the LLC and therefore has no right to participate in management or to conduct the LLC’s business, no right to require access to information concerning LLC transactions, and no right to inspect or copy LLC records. 805 ILCS 180/30-10(d).</p>
<hr class="wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity"/>
<h5 class="wp-block-heading">PRACTICE NOTE:</h5>
<p>Relative to a manager-managed LLC, case law confirms that the right to manage the LLC is not a property interest that can be transferred. <em>Grochocinski v. Campbell (In re Campbell)</em>, 475 B.R. 622 (Bankr. N.D.Ill. 2012). In a gratuitous comment (see 475 B.R. at 631 n.6), however, the Campbell court suggested that the result would be different if the LLC were to be member-managed. The footnote is dicta — and, while arguably a correct interpretation of Section 541(c)-1 of the Bankruptcy Code, is likely incorrect outside a bankruptcy setting, based on the express language of the Illinois LLC Act. Prudence suggests, however, that for asset protection purposes, a manager-managed LLC is preferable.</p>
<hr class="wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity"/>
<h4 class="wp-block-heading">C. The Charging Order</h4>
<p>In a typical case, the operating agreement may very likely grant the manager of a manager-managed limited liability company the authority and discretion to determine if and when distributions will be made to interest holders. If the judgment creditor is holding only a charging order lien against the distributional interest of a member, the judgment creditor will receive nothing if no distributions are made.</p>
<p>At first glance it may appear that foreclosing on a distributional interest and acquiring the rights of the judgment debtor in the distributional interest is the logical next step if the judgment is not being satisfied pursuant to a charging order entered in accordance with 805 ILCS 180/30-20(a). It should be noted, however, that foreclosing on the charging order lien and becoming the actual owner of the distributional interest is not without risk to the judgment creditor.</p>
<p>LLCs are, with rare exceptions, taxed as partnerships, with all profits and losses passed through to the owners of distributional interests (whether they own that interest as a member or as merely a transferee). As many partners in partnerships, including many partners in law firm partnerships, are painfully aware, this attribute of partnership taxation can result in dreaded “phantom income”; that is, partnership-level income that is taxable to the partner even though no cash is distributed to the partner. This same rule of pass-through tax liability applies to virtually all LLCs. (The exception being the rare case in which an LLC makes an IRS election to be taxed as a “C” corporation.)</p>
<p>As long as a judgment creditor has only a charging order lien imposed under §30-20, the judgment creditor is merely a lienholder, not an owner of the distributional interest. Accordingly, the tax consequences of phantom income inure to the judgment debtor, who remains the owner of the distributional interest. If, however, a judgment creditor forecloses on the lien created by the charging order, as permitted under §30-20(b), the purchaser at the foreclosure sale becomes the owner of the distributional interest, with all the attendant tax consequences that flow with that ownership. If taxable profits are allocated to the distributional interest holder, but no cash distribution is actually made, the judgment creditor, as owner of the foreclosed-on distributional interest, is liable to pay taxes on the allocated profit. As a consequence, the judgment creditor may conceivably find itself in a worse financial circumstance than existed before foreclosure of its charging order lien.</p>
<h4 class="wp-block-heading">D. Authority of Manager To Withhold Distributions</h4>
<p>If the manager of a manager-managed limited liability company elects to not distribute profits, the owner of the distributional interest is exposed to the risk of incurring tax liabilities as a consequence of phantom income. For this reason, some operating agreements require distribution of available cash flow in amounts necessary cover the potential tax liability of the LLC’s members and distributional interest holders. Experience suggests this may be the exception rather than the rule.</p>
<p>Some may question whether a manager has the right, in the faithful discharge of the manager’s fiduciary duties, to withhold distributions to interest holders if cash is available. To find support, they may point to §15-3(g) of the Illinois LLC Act, through incorporation of §15-3(d), which provides that in the exercise of its duty of care to the LLC and its members, an LLC manager must exercise any rights arising under the Illinois LLC Act or under the operating agreement consistent with the obligation of good faith and fair dealing. 805 ILCS 180/15-3.</p>
<p>As negotiating leverage, they may also note that §35-1(5) of the Illinois LLC Act provides that:</p>
<blockquote class="wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow">
<p>“[o]n application by a transferee of a member’s interest, a judicial determination [may be made] that it is equitable to wind up the company’s business.”</p>
</blockquote>
<p>. . . arguing that the claimed breach of the manager’s fiduciary duty to distribute available income creates a circumstance that would make it equitable to wind up the company’s business.</p>
<p>Consider, however, §15-15, which provides:</p>
<blockquote class="wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow">
<p>“In discharging the duties of their respective positions, members and individual managers may, in considering the best long term and short term interests of the limited liability company, consider the effects of any action (including without limitation, action that may involve or relate to a change or potential change in control of the limited liability company) upon employees, suppliers, and customers of the limited liability company or its subsidiaries, communities in which offices or other establishments of the limited liability company or its subsidiaries are located, and all other pertinent factors.”</p>
</blockquote>
<p>If an LLC manager can make a plausible case that it is in the best long-term or short-term interests of the LLC to build cash reserves for reinvestment in the company to grow its business or to fund capital improvements, such case may likely serve as reasonable justification for a manager’s decision to withhold distributions of cash flow to interest holders in the faithful discharge of its duties — notwithstanding that interest holders may incur phantom income tax liability.</p>
<p>If the case can be made that the manager is acting within the scope of its authority under the operating agreement and discharging its duties in accordance with the statutory standard established by §15-15, a powerful argument would likely exist that it would be an abuse of the court’s discretion to determine that the manager’s exercise of such expressly granted authority creates an equitable ground to wind up the LLC’s business under §35-1(5).</p>
<hr class="wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity"/>
<h5 class="wp-block-heading">PRACTICE NOTE</h5>
<p>If an LLC member is subject to claims of creditors that may mature into a charging order, consider whether an LLC operating agreement that does not grant a manager full discretion to determine whether to make distributions may be amended to grant the manager full discretion.<em> Query:</em> Does such an amendment constitute a fraudulent transfer within the meaning of the Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act (UFTA), 740 ILCS 160/1, <em>et seq.</em>? Can a fraudulent transfer ever occur when there has been no transfer or encumbrance of an asset? If the ability to be a manager is not a property interest in a manager-managed LLC (see <em>Grochocinski v. Campbell (In re Campbell)</em>, 475 B.R. 622 (Bankr. N.D.Ill. 2012)), can amending the scope of the manager’s authority constitute the transfer or encumbrance of an asset or property interest within the meaning of the UFTA?</p>
<hr class="wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity"/>
<h4 class="wp-block-heading">E. The Springing Member</h4>
<p>The foregoing argument notwithstanding, if the judgment debtor were to be the sole member of a manager-managed limited liability company, with the result that upon foreclosure of the charging lien under 805 ILCS 180/30-20 the judgment creditor became the sole economic interest holder as owner of 100 percent of the distributional interest, a compelling case might be made that equity requires the business of the LLC to be wound up if requested by such 100% owner.</p>
<p>But what if, after foreclosure of the charging order on 100 percent of the distributional interest of the judgment debtor, the judgment creditor was, in fact, still not the owner of 100 percent of distributional interests in the LLC? What if, as of the time the foreclosure and transfer occurred, there was another distributional interest holder — which was, in fact, the sole member? Might that make a difference in the court’s determination that it is equitable to wind up the LLC’s business?</p>
<p>Based on the hypothetical facts we have been examining (i.e., foreclosure of 100 percent of the distributional interest held by all LLC members), how could this factual twist ever come into play?</p>
<p><em>Here’s how:</em></p>
<p>Consider §35-3(c)(2) of the Illinois LLC Act, which permits the articles of organization or operating agreement to provide for a new member to, essentially, spring into existence effective as of the dissociation of the last remaining member. (Transfer of all of a member’s distributional interest is an act of dissociation. See 805 ILCS 180/35-45(3).)</p>
<p>Suppose the operating agreement provides that within six months after dissociation of the last remaining member, the manager has the right to cause the LLC to issue, say, a one-percent distributional interest in the LLC to the manager, upon contribution by the manager to the LLC of an amount equal to one percent of the aggregate balance of all capital accounts, and that upon such occurrence the manager shall be admitted as a member? Upon being admitted as a member owning a one-percent distributional interest, the manager would be the sole member, with the ability to give unanimous approval to all actions requiring approval of the members. Might that make a compelling case that the LLC remains as a fully functioning entity capable of carrying out its business purpose? Consider, particularly, if the LLC operates a business as a going concern, with employees, vendors, and community stakeholders who benefit from the LLC’s continued existence and operation. Is it likely a court will find equitable grounds to order that the business of the LLC be wound up?</p>
<p>Obviously, each case must be judged on its own merits. But once again, from the standpoint of negotiating on behalf of a judgment debtor, plausible arguments well-grounded in fact and warranted by existing law that can create doubt in the mind of a judgment creditor as to the likely success of its enforcement efforts are valuable tools in reaching a favorable settlement.</p>
<h4 class="wp-block-heading"><a href="https://i0.wp.com/harp-onthis.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/IMG_01561.jpg"><img data-recalc-dims="1" loading="lazy" decoding="async" data-attachment-id="84" data-permalink="http://harp-onthis.com/illinois-llcs-the-asset-protection-advantage/img_0156-2/" data-orig-file="https://i0.wp.com/harp-onthis.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/IMG_01561.jpg?fit=537%2C720" data-orig-size="537,720" data-comments-opened="1" data-image-meta="{"aperture":"2.8","credit":"","camera":"iPhone 4","caption":"","created_timestamp":"1310642963","copyright":"","focal_length":"3.85","iso":"80","shutter_speed":"0.00149925037481","title":""}" data-image-title="IMG_0156" data-image-description="<p>RKH iPhone photo – Chicago – from USFDLG offices</p>
" data-image-caption="" data-medium-file="https://i0.wp.com/harp-onthis.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/IMG_01561.jpg?fit=223%2C300" data-large-file="https://i0.wp.com/harp-onthis.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/IMG_01561.jpg?fit=537%2C720" class=" size-medium wp-image-84 alignright" src="https://i0.wp.com/harp-onthis.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/IMG_01561.jpg?resize=223%2C300" alt="IMG_0156" width="223" height="300" srcset="https://i0.wp.com/harp-onthis.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/IMG_01561.jpg?resize=223%2C300 223w, https://i0.wp.com/harp-onthis.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/IMG_01561.jpg?w=537 537w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 223px) 100vw, 223px" /></a>F. How Do These LLC Provisions Aid a Commercial Real Estate Borrower?</h4>
<p>Narrowly speaking, one might wonder how everything discussed above helps in the typical commercial loan scenario in which the limited liability company is the borrower, with direct liability, and the LLC members are guarantors, also with direct liability. If the LLC members have a single project with a single loan from a single lender, the point is well taken. The lender does not need to go through the members to get to the LLC’s income and assets. It can simply enforce its judgment against the LLC, while simultaneously, if it so chooses, also pursuing the guarantor members.</p>
<p>But what if the guarantor members are active real estate investors/developers (or other investors/professionals) who don’t have just one project (or business) through one LLC and one lender, but rather have two or more projects (or businesses) through two or more separate LLCs with loans from two or more separate lenders?</p>
<p><em>EXAMPLE</em>: Consider this fact scenario:</p>
<p>Project A is owned by LLC A and financed by Lender A for $5,000,000 (Loan A).</p>
<p>Project B is owned by LLC B and financed by Lender B for $8,000,000 (Loan B).</p>
<p>The members of LLC A are X and Y, who jointly and severally guaranty Loan A.</p>
<p>The members of LLC B are X and Z, who jointly and severally guaranty Loan B.</p>
<p>LLC A and LLC B are each manager-managed LLCs, in each case managed by XYZ Management LLC, which is owned by X, Y, and Z as equal members. XYZ Management LLC is not a member of either LLC A or LLC B. XYZ Management LLC is jointly managed by X, Y, and Z.</p>
<p>Project B is doing well and has equity of $7,000,000, with annual net cash flow after debt service of $650,000, with taxable profits after depreciation of $600,000.</p>
<p>Project A is in default and facing a $3,000,000 deficiency after sale of the collateral, resulting in a personal judgment in favor of Lender A against members X and Y on their personal guaranties.</p>
<p>Assume X and Y have no other attachable assets.</p>
<p>Applying the asset protection-friendly provision of the Illinois LLC Act, (coupled with a thoughtfully structured operating agreement) what may be the likely outcome of Lender A’s efforts to enforce its judgments?</p>
<p>Lender A obtains a $5,000,000 judgment against LLC A and pursues members X and Y on their personal guaranties. After disposing of the collateral owned by LLC A for $2,000,000, Lender A obtains a $3,000,000 joint and several judgment against members X and Y on their personal guaranties.</p>
<p>Through a citation to discover assets or otherwise, Lender A learns that X is a 50-percent member of LLC B, which has net equity of $7,000,000. Lender A also learns that X and Y are members of XYZ Management LLC, each owning 33.3 percent of that LLC.</p>
<p>Lender A wishes to satisfy its $3,000,000 judgment by attaching the 50-percent membership interest of X in LLC B.</p>
<p>Pursuant to §30-20 of the Illinois LLC Act, 805 ILCS 180/30-20, Lender A’s exclusive remedy relative to the LLC interest of member X is to obtain a charging order, which is a lien against distributions payable to X. With LLC B having net cash flow after debt service of $650,000 per year, the most Lender B expects to receive is $325,000 per year, based on the 50-percent membership interest of X.</p>
<p>In fact, XYZ Management LLC (the manager of LLC A) decides to reserve $650,000 per year for capital repairs and improvements and as a reserve against possible tenant vacancies and other contingencies. XYZ Management LLC elects not to make any distributions to members. As a consequence, pursuant to Lender A’s charging order, Lender A gets nothing, because X is not entitled to receive any distributions from LLC B on its distributional interest.</p>
<p>Lender A is unhappy. Lender A contemplates foreclosing its lien on the distributional interest of X pursuant to §30-20(b). If it does so, Lender A will become the owner of the 50-percent distributional interest of X in LLC B and will be subject to taxable phantom income of $300,000 per year (50 percent of the hypothetical $600,000 per year in taxable income) as the owner of a 50-percent distributional interest. Instead of being better off, Lender A may be worse off, having incurred a substantial income tax liability.</p>
<p>As an alternative, Lender A decides to try to force a liquidation of LLC B, so that it will receive 50 percent of the hypothetical $7,000,000 in equity in the project owned and operated by LLC B. To do this, Lender A decides to pursue the interests of X and Y in XYZ Management LLC. Since X and Y each owns 33.3 percent of XYZ Management LLC, Lender A assumes it can take control of XYZ Management LLC by obtaining a charging order on the interests of X and Y in XYZ Management LLC and then acquiring 66.6 percent via foreclosure of its charging order lien pursuant to §30-20(b).</p>
<p>Lender A contemplates that by acquiring the ownership interests of two out of three members of XYZ Management LLC, including the interests of two out three of its managers, Lender A will control XYZ Management LLC and, through that control, will be the manager of LLC B and can direct a sale or liquidation of LLC B’s assets.</p>
<p>Unfortunately for Lender A, it discovers that by foreclosing on the interests of X and Y in XYZ Management LLC, Lender A acquires, pursuant to §30-20(b), only the interests of a transferee, with no right to vote as a member and no right to participate in management of XYZ Management LLC per §30-10(d). Therefore, Lender A still has no management authority with respect to LLC B.</p>
<p>Query: Based on the foregoing hypothetical facts and likely outcome of its enforcement efforts, might the lender be willing to consider settlement with X and Y for less than full payment?</p>
<h4 class="wp-block-heading">G. What Is the Defaulted Borrower’s Exit Strategy?</h4>
<p>Asset protection can be more an “art” than a science. There is no magic formula for success in protecting the assets and income of commercial real estate borrowers when a loan goes bad, but there are effective strategies that can help facilitate settlement upon favorable terms that may avoid catastrophic financial ruin.</p>
<div class="wp-block-image">
<figure class="alignleft"><a href="https://i0.wp.com/harp-onthis.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/dreamstimemedium_28551060.jpg"><img data-recalc-dims="1" loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="206" height="300" data-attachment-id="518" data-permalink="http://harp-onthis.com/the-little-known-two-year-rule-for-employment-restrictive-covenants-illinois/httpwww-dreamstime-comstock-photo-confused-business-man-thinking-wich-way-to-go-image28551060/" data-orig-file="https://i0.wp.com/harp-onthis.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/dreamstimemedium_28551060.jpg?fit=1437%2C2087" data-orig-size="1437,2087" data-comments-opened="1" data-image-meta="{"aperture":"0","credit":"","camera":"","caption":"","created_timestamp":"0","copyright":"(c) Feedough | Dreamstime.com","focal_length":"0","iso":"0","shutter_speed":"0","title":"http:\/\/www.dreamstime.com\/stock-photo-confused-business-man-thinking-wich-way-to-go-image28551060"}" data-image-title="http://www.dreamstime.com/stock-photo-confused-business-man-thinking-wich-way-to-go-image28551060" data-image-description="" data-image-caption="" data-medium-file="https://i0.wp.com/harp-onthis.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/dreamstimemedium_28551060.jpg?fit=206%2C300" data-large-file="https://i0.wp.com/harp-onthis.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/dreamstimemedium_28551060.jpg?fit=705%2C1024" src="https://i0.wp.com/harp-onthis.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/dreamstimemedium_28551060.jpg?resize=206%2C300" alt="http://www.dreamstime.com/stock-photo-confused-business-man-thinking-wich-way-to-go-image28551060" class="wp-image-518" srcset="https://i0.wp.com/harp-onthis.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/dreamstimemedium_28551060.jpg?resize=206%2C300 206w, https://i0.wp.com/harp-onthis.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/dreamstimemedium_28551060.jpg?resize=705%2C1024 705w, https://i0.wp.com/harp-onthis.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/dreamstimemedium_28551060.jpg?w=1437 1437w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 206px) 100vw, 206px" /></a></figure></div>
<p>A principal objective of asset protection — and even most defensive efforts on behalf of a commercial real estate borrower in the event of default on a commercial real estate loan — is typically to motivate the lender to settle on favorable terms. What terms a borrower or guarantor may consider favorable depends on the facts and circumstances of the particular case.</p>
<p>Often, the favorable outcome being sought is a release of the loan guarantors from personal liability on their loan guaranties. This may require the payment of some money by the guarantors, but ideally substantially less that the full exposure on the personal guaranty.</p>
<p>Generally, the lender is seeking to maximize its recovery. If it can recover the entire indebtedness and costs of collection, the lender will seek full recovery. If full recovery becomes doubtful, however, most lenders will settle for an approximation of what the lender reasonably expects it will net through continued forced collection efforts. The lender’s objective of maximizing recovery has been expressly incorporated into financial institution supervisory guidance through the joint financial regulators’ <em>Policy Statement on Prudent Commercial Real Estate Loan Workouts</em>, <a href="http://www.fdic.gov/news/news/financial/2009/fil09061a1.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener">www.fdic.gov/news/news/financial/2009/fil09061a1.pdf</a>.</p>
<p>Weighing the costs of recovery against the amount of recovery likely to be obtained is a relevant factor for lenders to consider in maximizing their recovery. Money has “time value” as well. The more quickly money is recovered, the more value it has. The fact that a judgment may be accruing interest at nine percent per annum, or that the borrower and its guarantors are liable to pay costs of collection, including reasonable attorneys’ fees, becomes fairly meaningless if the borrower and guarantors have no assets or income from which the lender can readily recover its claim. If the borrower and/or guarantors are properly positioned to borrow funds from friends or family to pay even a modest settlement that is equivalent to, or slightly exceeds, what the lender can readily recover through forced collection efforts, settlement is a plausible outcome.</p>
<p>The more difficult and doubtful collection efforts become, the more likely one may be to obtain favorable settlement terms.</p>
<h4 class="wp-block-heading">H. Timing Consideration for Asset Protection</h4>
<p>Asset protection strategies are most effective when planned far in advance. Transfers of assets into a limited liability company or other asset protection-friendly vehicle can come too late if not completed well in advance of financial difficulties. The statute of limitations for a transfer constituting a fraudulent transfer is four years. 740 ILCS 160/10. Fortunately for most commercial real estate borrowers, Illinois business owners and Illinois licensed professionals, no transfer may be necessary for them to avail themselves of the asset protection advantages of an Illinois LLC since most commercial real estate projects financed in the past several years, and most Illinois based businesses, and many Illinois licensed professions, have been owned from the outset in an Illinois LLC. Creative amendment to an existing operating agreement may be sufficient to increase the level of asset protection.</p>
<p>Planning ahead is the ideal solution — but sometimes you just have to take what the statute gives you. For Illinois LLCs, the Illinois LLC Act actually gives quite a lot.</p>
<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><span style="text-decoration: underline;">PART II</span>: Immunity from Liability of Members and Managers</h3>
<p>In Part I of this article, we discussed the key sections of the Illinois LLC Act which protect the LLC, its business, and other members, if any, by limiting recovery <em>vis-à-vis</em> the LLC of a judgment entered against an LLC member.</p>
<p>Of equal or greater value is 805 ILCS 180/10-10, as interpreted and sustained in Dass v. Yale, 2013 IL App (1st) 122520; 3 N.E.3d 858.</p>
<p>A. <strong>805 ILCS 180/10-10</strong> provides, as follows:</p>
<blockquote class="wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow">
<p>“(a) Except as otherwise provided in subsection (d) of this Section, the debts, obligations and liabilities of a limited liability company, whether arising in contract, tort, or otherwise, are solely the debts, obligations, and liabilities of the company. A member or manager is not personally liable for a debt, obligation, or liability of the company solely by reason of being or acting as a member or manager.</p>
<p>(b) (Blank)</p>
<p>(c) The failure of a limited liability company to observe the usual company formalities or requirements relating to the exercise of company powers or management of its business is not a ground for imposing personal liability on the members of managers for liabilities of the company.</p>
<p>(d) All or specified members of a limited liability company are liable in their capacity as members for all or specified debts, obligations, or liabilities of the company if:</p>
<p>(1) a provision to that effect is contained in the articles of organization; and</p>
<p>(2) a member so liable has consented in writing to the adoption of the provision or to be bound by the provisions.”</p>
</blockquote>
<h4 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>B. <em>Dass v. Yale</em></strong>, 2013 IL App (1st) 122520; 3 N.E.3d 858, cert. denied.</h4>
<p>In <em>Dass v. Yale</em>, the plaintiff claimed that Yale, the sole managing member of Wolcott LLC, an Illinois limited liability company, defrauded the plaintiff in connection with the sale of a condominium unit by making false representations plaintiff claimed constituted, <em>inter alia</em>, common law fraud. <em>See id</em>., ¶ 2.</p>
<div class="wp-block-image">
<figure class="alignleft"><a href="https://i0.wp.com/harp-onthis.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/RSP_LogoFull_2PMS.jpg"><img data-recalc-dims="1" loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="300" height="109" data-attachment-id="283" data-permalink="http://harp-onthis.com/about/rsp_logofull_2pms/" data-orig-file="https://i0.wp.com/harp-onthis.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/RSP_LogoFull_2PMS.jpg?fit=963%2C350" data-orig-size="963,350" data-comments-opened="1" data-image-meta="{"aperture":"0","credit":"","camera":"","caption":"","created_timestamp":"0","copyright":"","focal_length":"0","iso":"0","shutter_speed":"0","title":""}" data-image-title="RSP_LogoFull_2PMS" data-image-description="" data-image-caption="" data-medium-file="https://i0.wp.com/harp-onthis.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/RSP_LogoFull_2PMS.jpg?fit=300%2C109" data-large-file="https://i0.wp.com/harp-onthis.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/RSP_LogoFull_2PMS.jpg?fit=963%2C350" src="https://i0.wp.com/harp-onthis.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/RSP_LogoFull_2PMS.jpg?resize=300%2C109" alt="RSP_LogoFull_2PMS" class="wp-image-283" srcset="https://i0.wp.com/harp-onthis.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/RSP_LogoFull_2PMS.jpg?resize=300%2C109 300w, https://i0.wp.com/harp-onthis.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/RSP_LogoFull_2PMS.jpg?resize=500%2C181 500w, https://i0.wp.com/harp-onthis.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/RSP_LogoFull_2PMS.jpg?w=963 963w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px" /></a></figure></div>
<p>Yale moved to dismiss the claims against him, asserting he was insulated from liability under Section 10-10 of the Illinois LLC Act. The plaintiff objected, claiming the legislature never intended Section 10-10 of the Illinois LLC Act to shield limited liability company members or managers who commit fraud. The trial court disagreed, and sided with defendant Yale, finding that members and managers are immune from liability under Section 10-10 of the Illinois LLC Act and granted Yale’s motion to dismiss. <em>Id.</em> ¶ 3. The plaintiff appealed.</p>
<p>The Appellate Court noted that plaintiff Dass was not asserting a right to pierce the LLC entity veil, using any recognized piercing test (which will be discussed in Part II – C, below), but rather was asserting liability of Yale based, essentially, upon the general notion (as incorporated in the legislative comments to Section 303 of the Uniform Limited Liability Company Act (the “Uniform Act”)) that an agent, even while acting on behalf of a principal, is jointly and severally liable for tortious conduct committed by the agent. Id. ¶¶ 36, 40. Arguing that Section 10-10 of the Illinois LLC Act is substantively similar to Section 303 of the Uniform Act, plaintiff Dass asserted that Yale should be liable for the claimed fraud (or, at least, should have to answer for the claim, rather than be dismissed pursuant to Yale’s motion to dismiss).</p>
<p>The Appellate Court also noted that Section 303 of the Uniform Act and the comments accompanying Section 303 may normally be persuasive authority in interpreting Section 10-10 of the Illinois LLC Act due to similar language used in each, even though neither Section 303 nor the comments are formally a part of the Illinois LLC Act. Id., ¶¶ 40-41.Taking into consideration of the history of the Illinois LLC Act and other cases interpreting the history, however, the Appellate Court determined that the trial court was correct in finding that Yale is shielded from liability. The court stated:</p>
<blockquote class="wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow">
<p>“Indeed, examining the history of the LLC Act itself demonstrates that the trial court was correct in interpreting section 10-10 to shield Yale from liability. The current language of section 10-10 has been in effect since January 1, 1998. See Pub. Act. 90-0424 (eff. Jan. 1, 1998). Prior to that, section 10-10 read:</p>
<p>(a) A member of a limited liability company shall be personally liable for any act, debt, obligation or liability of the limited liability company or another member or manager to the extent that a shareholder of an Illinois business corporation is liable in an analogous circumstance under Illinois law.</p>
<p>(b) A manager of a limited liability company shall be personally liable for any act, debt, obligation or liability of the limited liability company or another member or manager to the extent that a shareholder of an Illinois business corporation is liable in an analogous circumstance under Illinois law. 805 ILCS 180/10-10 (West 1996).</p>
<p>Generally, a change to the unambiguous language of a statute creates a rebuttable presumption that the amendment was intended to change the law. Here, the language of the LLC Act was changed by removing language explicitly providing for personal liability. As we noted in <em>Puleo,</em> “[a]s we have not found any legislative commentary regarding that amendment, we presume that by removing the noted statutory language, the legislature meant to shield a member or manager of an LLC from personal liability.” <em>Dass</em>, 2013 IL App (1st) 122520, ¶ 41 (internal citations omitted).”</p>
</blockquote>
<p>The court also noted that “the express language of section 10-10 (currently) provides that ‘the debts, obligations, and liabilities of a limited liability company, <em>whether arising in contract, tort, or otherwise</em>, are solely the liabilities of the company.’ We see no reason why the reasoning of <em>Puleo</em> and <em>Carollo</em>, which focused on the language of the LLC Act and its amendment, would not apply to a liability arising in tort, as in the case at bar, when such a scenario is expressly contemplated by the language of section 10-10. Accordingly, we affirm the trial court’s dismissal of plaintiffs’ complaint.” <em>Id</em>. ¶ 44 (emphasis in original) (internal citations omitted).</p>
<p>The plaintiff petitioned the Illinois Supreme Court for leave to appeal, which was denied on March 26, 2014. 2014 WL 1385161, 5 N.E.3d 1123 (Ill. Mar. 26, 2014). Thus, the decision stands as the binding law of Illinois.</p>
<h4 class="wp-block-heading">C. Piercing the LLC Entity Veil</h4>
<p>In a footnote, the Appellate Court in <em>Dass v. Yale</em> stated as follows: “We note that <em>Puleo</em> was somewhat limited in <em>Westmeyer v. Flynn</em>, 382 Ill. App. 3d 952, 960, 321 Ill. Dec. 406, 889 N.E.2d 671 (2008), where we found that section 10-10 did not bar actions involving piercing the</p>
<div class="wp-block-image">
<figure class="alignright"><a href="https://i0.wp.com/harp-onthis.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/Harp-3_17_15-019.jpg"><img data-recalc-dims="1" loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="199" height="300" data-attachment-id="1145" data-permalink="http://harp-onthis.com/due-diligence-checklists-for-commercial-real-estate-transactions-3/harp-3_17_15-019/" data-orig-file="https://i0.wp.com/harp-onthis.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/Harp-3_17_15-019.jpg?fit=2848%2C4288" data-orig-size="2848,4288" data-comments-opened="1" data-image-meta="{"aperture":"9","credit":"","camera":"NIKON D300","caption":"","created_timestamp":"1426589698","copyright":"","focal_length":"52","iso":"200","shutter_speed":"0.008","title":"","orientation":"0"}" data-image-title="Harp 3_17_15-019" data-image-description="" data-image-caption="<p>R. Kymn Harp<br />
Robbins, Salomon & Patt, Ltd.</p>
" data-medium-file="https://i0.wp.com/harp-onthis.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/Harp-3_17_15-019.jpg?fit=199%2C300" data-large-file="https://i0.wp.com/harp-onthis.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/Harp-3_17_15-019.jpg?fit=680%2C1024" src="https://i0.wp.com/harp-onthis.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/Harp-3_17_15-019.jpg?resize=199%2C300" alt="R. Kymn Harp Robbins, Salomon & Patt, Ltd." class="wp-image-1145" srcset="https://i0.wp.com/harp-onthis.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/Harp-3_17_15-019.jpg?resize=199%2C300 199w, https://i0.wp.com/harp-onthis.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/Harp-3_17_15-019.jpg?resize=680%2C1024 680w, https://i0.wp.com/harp-onthis.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/Harp-3_17_15-019.jpg?w=2000 2000w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 199px) 100vw, 199px" /></a><figcaption class="wp-element-caption">R. Kymn Harp<br />Robbins, Salomon & Patt, Ltd.</figcaption></figure></div>
<p>corporate veil. However, in the case at bar, there has been no claim that the corporate veil should be pierced.” <em>Dass</em>, 2013 IL App (1st) 122520, at n. 7.</p>
<p>With that footnote, it is at least appropriate to consider the circumstances under which the entity veil of an Illinois limited liability company might properly be pierced.</p>
<p>With one significant exception, Illinois limited liability companies are subject to the same piercing rules as Illinois corporations. <em>Buckley v. Abuzir</em>, 2014 IL App (1st) 130469; 8 N.E.3d 1166; <em>Denmar Builders, Inc. v. Suhadolnik (In re Suhadolnik)</em>, No. 08-A-7116, 2009 WL 2591338, at *4 (Bankr. C.D. Ill. Aug. 20, 2009).</p>
<p>Illinois courts have developed fairly uniform rules on the subject of veil-piercing. “Courts may pierce the corporate veil, where to corporation is so organized and controlled by another entity that maintaining the fiction of separate entities would sanction fraud or promote injustice. <em>Buckley</em>, 2014 IL App (1st) 130469, ¶ 12. A party seeking to pierce the corporate veil must make a substantial showing that one corporation is a dummy or a sham for another.” <em>Id.; In re Estate of Wallen</em>, 262 Ill. App. 3d 61, 68 (2d Dist. 1994).</p>
<p>Illinois courts will pierce the corporate veil when the following two-part test is satisfied: “(1) where there is such a unity of interest and ownership that the separate personalities of the corporation and the parties who compose it no longer exist; and (2) circumstances are such that adherence to the fiction of a separate corporation would promote injustice or inequitable circumstances. <em>Tower Investors LLC v. 111 East Chestnut Consultants, Inc</em>., 371 Ill. App. 3d 1019, 1033-34 (1st Dist. 2007).</p>
<p>The first part of the test generally refers to the failure of the corporation to observe corporate formalities. The second part of the test looks to whether circumstances exist that would effectively sanction fraud if the veil is not pierced.</p>
<p>The first part of the two-part test for veil piercing does not apply to limited liability companies under the Illinois LLC Act, by reason of the express language of 805 ILCS 180/10-10(c), which provides “The failure of a limited liability company to observe the usual company formalities or requirements relating to the exercise of company powers or management of its business is not a ground for imposing personal liability on the members or managers for liabilities of the company.” Id.</p>
<p>Note, however, that “while the Act provides specifically that the failure to observe corporate formalities is not a ground for imposing personal liability on the members of an LLC, it does not bar other bases for corporate veil piercing, such as alter ego, fraud or undercapitalization.” <em>Westmeyer v. Flynn</em>, 382 Ill. App. 3d 952, 960 (1st Dist. 2008); <em>Denmar Builders, Inc.</em>, 2009 WL 2591338, at *4; I<em>n re Polo Builders, Inc.</em>, 388 B.R. 338, 384 (Bankr. N.D. Ill. 2008).</p>
<p>An in-depth discussion of the overall topic of LLC veil piercing is beyond the scope of this article. Generally speaking, however, it is not as simple as some attorneys seem to think. Under proper circumstances, however, piercing may be allowed.</p>
<p>Enlightening discussions of the topic of veil piercing can be found in cases such as: <em>Judson Atkinson Candies, Inc. v. Latini-Hohberger Dhimantec</em>, 529 F.3d 371 (7th Cir. 2008); <em>Buckley v. Abuzir,</em> 2014 IL App (1st) 130469; and <em>On Command Video v. Roti</em>, 705 F.3d 267 (7th Cir. 2013). As a general proposition, however, merely losing money, failing in business, or depleting available capital through the ordinary course of business operations will not be a sufficient basis to pierce the entity veil to get to the assets of LLC members or managers. A party seeking to pierce the entity veil must make a substantial showing that the entity is a sham or was used to intentionally mislead or defraud in circumstances that would promote injustice. Mere inability of an LLC to satisfy or pay its liabilities, without more, is not enough. See On Command Video, 705 F.3d at 272; <em>In re Estate of Wallen</em>, 262 Ill. App. 3d at 68; Buckley, 2014 IL App (1st) 130469; 8 N.E.3d 1166; and <em>Tower Investors LLC</em>, 371 Ill. App. 3d at 1033-34.</p>
<h5 class="wp-block-heading">*<em>Publishing Note</em>: Parts of this article first appeared in the Commercial Real Estate handbook published by the Illinois Institute for Continuing Legal Education as part of the author’s 2013 chapter supplement [Chapter 4.S.] to “<em>Commercial Real Estate Financing from the Borrower’s Perspective</em>”.</h5>
]]></content:encoded>
<wfw:commentRss>http://harp-onthis.com/illinois-llcs-the-asset-protection-advantage/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">1039</post-id> </item>
<item>
<title>STRATEGIES FOR ASSESSING COMMERCIAL TENANT CREDIT</title>
<link>http://harp-onthis.com/strategies-assessing-commercial-tenant-credit/</link>
<comments>http://harp-onthis.com/strategies-assessing-commercial-tenant-credit/#respond</comments>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kymn Harp]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2015 21:47:43 +0000</pubDate>
<category><![CDATA[Commercial Real Estate]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[#CRE]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[checklist]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[Chicago]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[commercial leasing]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[commercial real estate]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[conducting due diligence]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[consequences]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[development]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[due diligence checklist]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[enforcement actions]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[industrial property]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[investment]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[landlord concerns]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[leasing]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[tenant credit]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[transactions]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[what to look for]]></category>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://harp-onthis.com/?p=1024</guid>
<description><![CDATA[GUEST BLOG BY DAVID RESNICK of ROBBINS, SALOMON & PATT, LTD. When considering a lease, tenants are usually focused on the location, size and quality of the leased space, and perform some minimal diligence on the landlord and property manager […]]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="wp-block-image">
<figure class="alignleft"><a href="https://i0.wp.com/harp-onthis.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/Resnick_low_res_C_CSC2789.jpg"><img data-recalc-dims="1" loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="175" height="219" data-attachment-id="1023" data-permalink="http://harp-onthis.com/strategies-assessing-commercial-tenant-credit/resnick_low_res_c_csc2789/" data-orig-file="https://i0.wp.com/harp-onthis.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/Resnick_low_res_C_CSC2789.jpg?fit=175%2C219" data-orig-size="175,219" data-comments-opened="1" data-image-meta="{"aperture":"8","credit":"","camera":"NIKON D7000","caption":"","created_timestamp":"1367315896","copyright":"","focal_length":"92","iso":"125","shutter_speed":"0.01","title":"","orientation":"1"}" data-image-title="Resnick_low_res_C_CSC2789" data-image-description="" data-image-caption="<p>David Resnick, Attorney<br />
Robbins, Salomon & Patt, Ltd.</p>
" data-medium-file="https://i0.wp.com/harp-onthis.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/Resnick_low_res_C_CSC2789.jpg?fit=175%2C219" data-large-file="https://i0.wp.com/harp-onthis.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/Resnick_low_res_C_CSC2789.jpg?fit=175%2C219" src="https://i0.wp.com/harp-onthis.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/Resnick_low_res_C_CSC2789.jpg?resize=175%2C219" alt="David Resnick, Attorney Robbins, Salomon & Patt, Ltd." class="wp-image-1023"/></a><figcaption class="wp-element-caption">David Resnick, Attorney<br />Robbins, Salomon & Patt, Ltd.</figcaption></figure></div>
<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><em>GUEST BLOG BY DAVID RESNICK of ROBBINS, SALOMON & PATT, LTD.</em></h3>
<p>When considering a lease, tenants are usually focused on the location, size and quality of the leased space, and perform some minimal diligence on the landlord and property manager to ensure fair treatment over the course of the term. Landlords have a more difficult task,however. A prospective tenant, and most importantly, that tenant’s ability to pay rent, is often unknown to the landlord. In recent years, real estate professionals have witnessed expansion in the array of users of commercial space and at the same time, property owners have been compelled to seek out new types of tenants. Increasing numbers of start-ups and new ventures are seeking to lease space, many of which are backed by various types of equity financing. As a result of these changes, landlords should be particularly vigilant in understanding how their tenants make money, as well as the financial identities of the parties backstopping the obligations of those tenants.</p>
<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Analyze Tenant Credit</h2>
<div class="wp-block-image">
<figure class="alignright size-full is-resized"><img data-recalc-dims="1" loading="lazy" decoding="async" data-attachment-id="1847" data-permalink="http://harp-onthis.com/strategies-assessing-commercial-tenant-credit/businessmandoingpaperworkathomereadingfinancialreportlearn/" data-orig-file="https://i0.wp.com/harp-onthis.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/reviewing-taxes.jpg?fit=1000%2C666" data-orig-size="1000,666" data-comments-opened="1" data-image-meta="{"aperture":"0","credit":"Shutterstock","camera":"","caption":"","created_timestamp":"0","copyright":"Copyright (c) 2022 fizkes\/Shutterstock. No use without permission.","focal_length":"0","iso":"0","shutter_speed":"0","title":"Business,Man,Doing,Paperwork,At,Home,,Reading,Financial,Report,,Learn","orientation":"1"}" data-image-title="Business,Man,Doing,Paperwork,At,Home,,Reading,Financial,Report,,Learn" data-image-description="" data-image-caption="" data-medium-file="https://i0.wp.com/harp-onthis.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/reviewing-taxes.jpg?fit=300%2C200" data-large-file="https://i0.wp.com/harp-onthis.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/reviewing-taxes.jpg?fit=1000%2C666" src="https://i0.wp.com/harp-onthis.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/reviewing-taxes.jpg?resize=400%2C267" alt="reviewing taxes" class="wp-image-1847" width="400" height="267" srcset="https://i0.wp.com/harp-onthis.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/reviewing-taxes.jpg?w=1000 1000w, https://i0.wp.com/harp-onthis.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/reviewing-taxes.jpg?resize=300%2C200 300w, https://i0.wp.com/harp-onthis.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/reviewing-taxes.jpg?resize=768%2C511 768w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 400px) 100vw, 400px" /></figure></div>
<p>Landlords should always analyze tenant credit in the context of the lease. After all, the success of leased real estate, as well as the property owner’s ability to borrow against that asset, is dependent upon the stability of its tenants. While rent is the primary economic factor in any lease transaction, other factors such as term (including rights of extension), area of the premises (including rights of expansion and rights of first refusal on additional space) and the scope of tenant improvements create the platform upon which a tenant’s credit can be evaluated. For example, substantial build-out (regardless of who pays for it) that may inhibit the re-letting the space following a default. Therefore, landlords should be mindful of the tenant’s capacity to pay its construction obligations, which capacity is usually encapsulated in the tenant’s credit and litigation history.</p>
<p>A proper underwriting of a tenant’s credit requires a thorough understanding of that tenant’s business. A prudent landlord will pay attention not only to the tenant’s sources of revenue, but to the market upon which the tenant relies and the business plan upon which the tenant charts its future success. What are the contours of the business model? Is the revenue sustainable? What is the plan for future growth? Has the tenant gone through restructuring or been forced to lay off personnel? Landlords can avoid doing business with troubled or unstable tenants by performing background, lien and litigation searches on the tenant parties as part of the underwriting process. This kind of diligence can usually be completed in a short time-frame at a reasonable cost, and may save substantial time and money if the landlord is forced to evict a tenant it should have known to be at increased risk of default.</p>
<p>Technology has given rise to new products which enhance the process of underwriting tenant credit. For example, the Chicago firm (RE)Meter has created the first “credit score” for commercial tenants, which captures and synthesizes proposed lease transaction terms and basic tenant financial information with exclusive data maintained by a number of federal agencies, including the U.S. Census Bureau, the Department of Labor and the Internal Revenue Service ((RE)Meter is the first firm to access IRS information in this context). The end product, called the TIL Report, can be completed in a mere 15 minutes and offers landlords a sector- and market-specific analysis of its prospective tenants, reflecting a number of detailed metrics including growth trends, profitability and rent per employee. Innovations like these have altered the landscape of tenant underwriting and will enable landlords to make more prudent decisions when marketing space and assessing the risk of potential tenants.</p>
<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Tenant Credit Enhancements</h2>
<p>Conventionally, several mechanisms exist to enhance the credit of a prospective tenant who fails on its own to meet the underwriting criteria of the landlord. The first and foremost of these is the security deposit, which is posted by the tenant in the form of cash or letter of credit and held by the landlord for all or part of the duration of the lease. The deposit may be applied by the landlord towards unpaid amounts payable under the lease like rent, proportionate common area expenses or taxes, or reimbursement of amounts expended to repair damage to the premises. A stronger credit tenant may receive the benefit of a return of all or part of the deposit held by landlord over time, provided the tenant has not defaulted.</p>
<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Security Deposits</h2>
<p>While cash security deposits have historically been the industry standard in commercial leasing, landlords are increasingly requiring letter of credit security deposits instead. For many landlords, the benefits of cash on hand are overshadowed by the security of an obligation issued by a third-party bank, particularly when the landlord is able to draw on the letter of credit following a default without notice to or consent by the tenant. Letters of credit also may bear advantages to the landlord following a bankruptcy by the tenant, as the obligation of the issuing bank to pay on the letter of credit is independent of the tenant’s obligations under the lease. However, some courts have found that letter of credit security deposits are part of the tenant’s bankruptcy estate and thus subject to the cap on a landlord’s claim for damages under Section 502(b)(6) of the United States Bankruptcy Code.</p>
<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Lease Guaranties</h2>
<p>Guaranties are a common alternative for securing the credit of a commercial tenant. In the context of commercial leasing, a guaranty is a legally enforceable undertaking by a third party to fulfill the payment or performance obligations of the tenant under a lease. A guaranty may be given by an entity, such as a corporate parent or affiliate, or an individual, such as a majority owner or other key principal of the tenant. To most effectively backstop the credit of the tenant, a guaranty should be a guaranty of payment as opposed to a guaranty of performance. This distinction ensures that the landlord will not be forced to exhaust its remedies against the tenant before pursuing enforcement of the guaranty. Rather, the landlord may pursue the tenant and guarantor simultaneously for unpaid amounts under the lease.</p>
<p>Once a landlord has determined that it will require a guaranty to secure the tenant’s obligations under the lease, what should the landlord look for in evaluating potential guarantors? The most straightforward factor, notwithstanding whether the proposed guarantor is an individual or an entity, is cash on hand and other liquid assets. In satisfaction of the landlord’s inquiry, an guarantors may produce income tax returns, bank statements, financial statements, balance sheets or other evidence of personal holdings. The review process for publicly traded companies is simplified in that pertinent financial information is publicly available. Of course, testing for liquidity has its flaws. There exists no iron-clad protection against fraud, and disclosures only present a snapshot of a party’s credit at the time of the test as opposed to a forecast of future liquidity and stability. A review of tenant and guarantor financial information, as well as credit reports for collections, pledging of material assets or opening of new lines of credit, should be performed at regular intervals throughout the term of the lease.</p>
<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Financial Disclosure Challenges</h2>
<p>Financial disclosures may be problematic or some privately-held concerns. Particularly in the modern era of start-up firms financed by venture capital and private equity interests, tenants and proposed guarantors may be limited by investor confidentiality. With this in mind, parties to a lease should clarify in the lease or guaranty the form of any future disclosures to be made. Tenants and guarantors may resist delivering full-fledged audited financial statements in favor of reduced balance sheets or nominal form of profit and loss statement. Depending on the profile of the market and building, landlords may be willing to accept less than full disclosure if the statements deliver a reasonable picture of the financial health of the party delivering them.</p>
<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Tenant Stability and Performance Incentives</h2>
<p>As lease term and the disclosure provisions are negotiated, tenants may push the landlord for a variety of concessions that effectively incentivize and reward tenant stability. Perhaps the most common examples of this request are limitations on the security deposit, pledged assets or the liability under or the term of the guaranty. Limitations like these can take a variety of forms, from a fixed term to a cap on the guarantor’s liability based upon a fixed dollar-figure or factor of rent payable under the lease, to an automatic reduction of either the security deposit or the cap on the guarantor’s liability over time. In each instance, the landlord should be cognizant of the hurdles the tenant party must overcome to receive the benefit of these limitations, none more important than the uninterrupted timely payment of rent without default.</p>
<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Tenant Credit is a Key to Successful Lease Performance</h2>
<p>In light of the crises our industry has withstood in recent years, a landlord’s exuberance in welcoming new tenants is understandable. But in the current era of increasing economic growth, landlords should adopt a cautious approach in understanding and monitoring the business of their tenants. No landlord can predict with certainty the success or failure of its tenants; however, perhaps now more than ever, a thorough and complete examination of tenant credit is essential to the financial success of any leased real estate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
<wfw:commentRss>http://harp-onthis.com/strategies-assessing-commercial-tenant-credit/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">1024</post-id> </item>
<item>
<title>Land Patent Defense is Frivolous, Sanctionable, and a Class 4 Felony in Illinois</title>
<link>http://harp-onthis.com/land-patent-defense-frivolous-sanctionable-class-4-felony-illinois/</link>
<comments>http://harp-onthis.com/land-patent-defense-frivolous-sanctionable-class-4-felony-illinois/#comments</comments>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kymn Harp]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 16 Oct 2013 16:53:03 +0000</pubDate>
<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[Commercial Real Estate]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[lending]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[#CRE]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[bank]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[bankers]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[banks]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[commercial real estate]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[consequences]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[default]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[defense]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[economy]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[enforcement actions]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[foreclosure]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[lenders]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[loan workouts]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[loans]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[real estate]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[suit]]></category>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://harp-onthis.com/?p=633</guid>
<description><![CDATA[The law is clear.  The so-called “Land Patent” defense does NOT work. This is not earth shattering news, but it is a reminder that defenses to mortgage foreclosure actions must be well grounded in fact and warranted by existing law […]]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<h2 class="wp-block-heading">The law is clear. The so-called “Land Patent” defense does NOT work.</h2>
<div class="wp-block-image">
<figure class="alignright size-full is-resized"><img data-recalc-dims="1" loading="lazy" decoding="async" data-attachment-id="1889" data-permalink="http://harp-onthis.com/land-patent-defense-frivolous-sanctionable-class-4-felony-illinois/conceptofofficeforpurchaseandsaleorconstructionof/" data-orig-file="https://i0.wp.com/harp-onthis.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/office-for-purchase-and-sale-or-construction-of-housing-real-estate-houses-plot-of-land.jpg?fit=1000%2C666" data-orig-size="1000,666" data-comments-opened="1" data-image-meta="{"aperture":"0","credit":"Shutterstock","camera":"","caption":"","created_timestamp":"0","copyright":"Copyright (c) 2022 phBodrova\/Shutterstock. No use without permission.","focal_length":"0","iso":"0","shutter_speed":"0","title":"Concept,Of,Office,For,Purchase,And,Sale,Or,Construction,Of","orientation":"1"}" data-image-title="Concept,Of,Office,For,Purchase,And,Sale,Or,Construction,Of" data-image-description="" data-image-caption="" data-medium-file="https://i0.wp.com/harp-onthis.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/office-for-purchase-and-sale-or-construction-of-housing-real-estate-houses-plot-of-land.jpg?fit=300%2C200" data-large-file="https://i0.wp.com/harp-onthis.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/office-for-purchase-and-sale-or-construction-of-housing-real-estate-houses-plot-of-land.jpg?fit=1000%2C666" src="https://i0.wp.com/harp-onthis.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/office-for-purchase-and-sale-or-construction-of-housing-real-estate-houses-plot-of-land.jpg?resize=400%2C266" alt="office for purchase and sale or construction of housing real estate houses plot of land" class="wp-image-1889" width="400" height="266" srcset="https://i0.wp.com/harp-onthis.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/office-for-purchase-and-sale-or-construction-of-housing-real-estate-houses-plot-of-land.jpg?w=1000 1000w, https://i0.wp.com/harp-onthis.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/office-for-purchase-and-sale-or-construction-of-housing-real-estate-houses-plot-of-land.jpg?resize=300%2C200 300w, https://i0.wp.com/harp-onthis.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/office-for-purchase-and-sale-or-construction-of-housing-real-estate-houses-plot-of-land.jpg?resize=768%2C511 768w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 400px) 100vw, 400px" /></figure></div>
<p>This is not earth shattering news, but it is a reminder that defenses to mortgage foreclosure actions must be well grounded in fact and warranted by existing law or a good faith argument for the extension, modification or reversal of existing law. In simple terms – defenses must at least be legally plausible.</p>
<p>One of the more bizarre defenses raised by a small group of defendants who refer to themselves as “sovereign citizens” is a so-called “land patent” defense. It does not work – at least not in Illinois.</p>
<p>In a long, unusual, and fairly cumbersome opinion filed by the Illinois Appellate Court on September 23, 2013, in the case of <a title="Parkway Bank v. Korzen" href="http://www.state.il.us/court/Opinions/AppellateCourt/2013/1stDistrict/1130380.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><em>Parkway Bank and Trust Company v. Victor Korzen and Tomas Zanzola, 2013 IL App (1st) 130380</em></a>, the First District Appellate Court addressed “<em>a number of tactics a small number of debtors use to both delay the ultimate resolution of cases against them and to use the legal system for improper purposes. Some people might classify those who engage in these tactics as “sovereign citizens”, but regardless of nomenclature, their methods are not only counterproductive, but detrimental to the efficient and fair administration of justice. A recent New York Times article noted the FBI has labeled the strategy as “paper terrorism”</em>.</p>
<p>I am a strong proponent of raising every viable defense to a mortgage foreclosure when representing a defendant. There are many defects in mortgage loan files, and many more defects arising from faulty loan administration, defective securitization of syndicated loans, and breaches of public policy and black letter law by lenders. Some lenders have fraudulently manufactured and forged missing assignment documents and other documents to fill material document gaps. There are legitimate defenses that can be raised and valid lender liability claims that can be pursued in many circumstances if the situation warrants and the resources are available to mount a strong defense and counter-attack.</p>
<p>That said, not every so-called “defense” is legitimate, and some are just plain goofy.</p>
<p>Among the illegitimate “defenses” is the claimed “land patent” defense. It simply does not work. It is not well grounded in law, and there is no good faith argument for the extension, modification or reversal of existing law that courts in Illinois – or probably anywhere in the United States – are likely to recognize as having been pursued in “good faith”. As a consequence, if you raise the “land patent” defense in defense of an Illinois mortgage foreclosure action, you are going to lose, be sanctioned, and perhaps be prosecuted for committing a Class 4 Felony.</p>
<p>In this short post, I do not intend to give an in-depth description of the (faulty) theory behind the land patent defense, but I will direct your attention to paragraph 72 et seq. of the <a title="Parkway Bank v. Korzen" href="http://www.state.il.us/court/Opinions/AppellateCourt/2013/1stDistrict/1130380.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Parkway Bank v. Korzen</a> case, referred to above. Read this case if you are thinking about using the land patent contrivance as a “defense”, particularly in an Illinois mortgage foreclosure action. It does not work.</p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
<wfw:commentRss>http://harp-onthis.com/land-patent-defense-frivolous-sanctionable-class-4-felony-illinois/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">633</post-id> </item>
<item>
<title>Dancing with Gorillas – Roulette – and CRE Litigation</title>
<link>http://harp-onthis.com/dancing-gorillas-roulette-cre-litigation/</link>
<comments>http://harp-onthis.com/dancing-gorillas-roulette-cre-litigation/#comments</comments>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kymn Harp]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 25 Sep 2013 22:38:09 +0000</pubDate>
<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[Commercial Real Estate]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[White Papers]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[#CRE]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[bank]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[bankers]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[banks]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[broker]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[business]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[Chicago]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[commercial litigation]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[commercial real estate]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[consequences]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[CRE litigation]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[default]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[defense]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[development]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[enforcement actions]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[foreclosure]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[industrial property]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[investment]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[lenders]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[lending]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[loan workouts]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[loans]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[property]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[purchase]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[should I sue]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[suit]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[transactions]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[what to look for]]></category>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://harp-onthis.com/?p=616</guid>
<description><![CDATA[The Time to Decide – Commercial Real Estate Litigation A sage once said, “The time to worry about where the ball will drop is before the wheel is spun”.  He was speaking about roulette, of course, but the wisdom of […]]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<h1 class="wp-block-heading">The Time to Decide – Commercial Real Estate Litigation</h1>
<div class="wp-block-image">
<figure class="alignright size-full is-resized"><img data-recalc-dims="1" loading="lazy" decoding="async" data-attachment-id="1894" data-permalink="http://harp-onthis.com/dancing-gorillas-roulette-cre-litigation/happyafricanamericancouplesitbydeskattravelagent/" data-orig-file="https://i0.wp.com/harp-onthis.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/confident-young-businessman-talk-with-black-husband-wife-customers-offer-house-to-buy.jpg?fit=1000%2C667" data-orig-size="1000,667" data-comments-opened="1" data-image-meta="{"aperture":"0","credit":"Shutterstock","camera":"","caption":"","created_timestamp":"0","copyright":"Copyright (c) 2021 fizkes\/Shutterstock. No use without permission.","focal_length":"0","iso":"0","shutter_speed":"0","title":"Happy,African,American,Couple,Sit,By,Desk,At,Travel,Agent","orientation":"1"}" data-image-title="Happy,African,American,Couple,Sit,By,Desk,At,Travel,Agent" data-image-description="" data-image-caption="" data-medium-file="https://i0.wp.com/harp-onthis.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/confident-young-businessman-talk-with-black-husband-wife-customers-offer-house-to-buy.jpg?fit=300%2C200" data-large-file="https://i0.wp.com/harp-onthis.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/confident-young-businessman-talk-with-black-husband-wife-customers-offer-house-to-buy.jpg?fit=1000%2C667" src="https://i0.wp.com/harp-onthis.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/confident-young-businessman-talk-with-black-husband-wife-customers-offer-house-to-buy.jpg?resize=400%2C267" alt="confident young businessman talk with black husband wife customers offer house to buy" class="wp-image-1894" width="400" height="267" srcset="https://i0.wp.com/harp-onthis.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/confident-young-businessman-talk-with-black-husband-wife-customers-offer-house-to-buy.jpg?w=1000 1000w, https://i0.wp.com/harp-onthis.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/confident-young-businessman-talk-with-black-husband-wife-customers-offer-house-to-buy.jpg?resize=300%2C200 300w, https://i0.wp.com/harp-onthis.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/confident-young-businessman-talk-with-black-husband-wife-customers-offer-house-to-buy.jpg?resize=768%2C512 768w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 400px) 100vw, 400px" /></figure></div>
<p><!-- [if gte mso 9]><xml>
<w:worddocument>
<w:view>Normal</w:view>
<w:zoom>0</w:zoom>
<w:trackmoves></w:trackmoves>
<w:trackformatting></w:trackformatting>
<w:punctuationkerning></w:punctuationkerning>
<w:validateagainstschemas></w:validateagainstschemas>
<w:saveifxmlinvalid>false</w:saveifxmlinvalid>
<w:ignoremixedcontent>false</w:ignoremixedcontent>
<w:alwaysshowplaceholdertext>false</w:alwaysshowplaceholdertext>
<w:donotpromoteqf></w:donotpromoteqf>
<w:lidthemeother>EN-US</w:lidthemeother>
<w:lidthemeasian>X-NONE</w:lidthemeasian>
<w:lidthemecomplexscript>X-NONE</w:lidthemecomplexscript>
<w:compatibility>
<w:breakwrappedtables></w:breakwrappedtables>
<w:snaptogridincell></w:snaptogridincell>
<w:wraptextwithpunct></w:wraptextwithpunct>
<w:useasianbreakrules></w:useasianbreakrules>
<w:dontgrowautofit></w:dontgrowautofit>
<w:splitpgbreakandparamark></w:splitpgbreakandparamark>
<w:enableopentypekerning></w:enableopentypekerning>
<w:dontflipmirrorindents></w:dontflipmirrorindents>
<w:overridetablestylehps></w:overridetablestylehps>
</w:compatibility>
<m:mathpr>
<m:mathfont m:val="Cambria Math"></m:mathfont>
<m:brkbin m:val="before"></m:brkbin>
<m:brkbinsub m:val="--"></m:brkbinsub>
<m:smallfrac m:val="off"></m:smallfrac>
<m:dispdef></m:dispdef>
<m:lmargin m:val="0"></m:lmargin>
<m:rmargin m:val="0"></m:rmargin>
<m:defjc m:val="centerGroup"></m:defjc>
<m:wrapindent m:val="1440"></m:wrapindent>
<m:intlim m:val="subSup"></m:intlim>
<m:narylim m:val="undOvr"></m:narylim>
</m:mathpr></w:worddocument>
</xml>< ![endif]--><!-- [if gte mso 9]><xml>
<w:latentstyles DefLockedState="false" DefUnhideWhenUsed="true"
DefSemiHidden="true" DefQFormat="false" DefPriority="99"
LatentStyleCount="267">
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="0" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="Normal"></w:lsdexception>
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="9" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="heading 1"></w:lsdexception>
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="9" QFormat="true" Name="heading 2"></w:lsdexception>
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="9" QFormat="true" Name="heading 3"></w:lsdexception>
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="9" QFormat="true" Name="heading 4"></w:lsdexception>
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="9" QFormat="true" Name="heading 5"></w:lsdexception>
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="9" QFormat="true" Name="heading 6"></w:lsdexception>
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="9" QFormat="true" Name="heading 7"></w:lsdexception>
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="9" QFormat="true" Name="heading 8"></w:lsdexception>
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="9" QFormat="true" Name="heading 9"></w:lsdexception>
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="39" Name="toc 1"></w:lsdexception>
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="39" Name="toc 2"></w:lsdexception>
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="39" Name="toc 3"></w:lsdexception>
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="39" Name="toc 4"></w:lsdexception>
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="39" Name="toc 5"></w:lsdexception>
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="39" Name="toc 6"></w:lsdexception>
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="39" Name="toc 7"></w:lsdexception>
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="39" Name="toc 8"></w:lsdexception>
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="39" Name="toc 9"></w:lsdexception>
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="35" QFormat="true" Name="caption"></w:lsdexception>
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="10" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="Title"></w:lsdexception>
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="1" Name="Default Paragraph Font"></w:lsdexception>
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="11" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="Subtitle"></w:lsdexception>
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="22" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="Strong"></w:lsdexception>
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="20" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="Emphasis"></w:lsdexception>
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="59" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Table Grid"></w:lsdexception>
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Placeholder Text"></w:lsdexception>
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="1" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="No Spacing"></w:lsdexception>
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="60" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Shading"></w:lsdexception>
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="61" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light List"></w:lsdexception>
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="62" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Grid"></w:lsdexception>
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="63" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 1"></w:lsdexception>
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="64" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 2"></w:lsdexception>
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="65" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 1"></w:lsdexception>
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="66" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 2"></w:lsdexception>
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="67" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 1"></w:lsdexception>
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="68" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 2"></w:lsdexception>
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="69" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 3"></w:lsdexception>
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="70" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Dark List"></w:lsdexception>
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="71" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Shading"></w:lsdexception>
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="72" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful List"></w:lsdexception>
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="73" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Grid"></w:lsdexception>
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="60" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Shading Accent 1"></w:lsdexception>
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="61" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light List Accent 1"></w:lsdexception>
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="62" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Grid Accent 1"></w:lsdexception>
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="63" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 1 Accent 1"></w:lsdexception>
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="64" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 2 Accent 1"></w:lsdexception>
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="65" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 1 Accent 1"></w:lsdexception>
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Revision"></w:lsdexception>
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="34" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="List Paragraph"></w:lsdexception>
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="29" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="Quote"></w:lsdexception>
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="30" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="Intense Quote"></w:lsdexception>
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="66" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 2 Accent 1"></w:lsdexception>
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="67" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 1 Accent 1"></w:lsdexception>
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="68" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 2 Accent 1"></w:lsdexception>
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="69" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 3 Accent 1"></w:lsdexception>
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="70" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Dark List Accent 1"></w:lsdexception>
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="71" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Shading Accent 1"></w:lsdexception>
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="72" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful List Accent 1"></w:lsdexception>
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="73" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Grid Accent 1"></w:lsdexception>
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="60" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Shading Accent 2"></w:lsdexception>
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="61" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light List Accent 2"></w:lsdexception>
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="62" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Grid Accent 2"></w:lsdexception>
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="63" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 1 Accent 2"></w:lsdexception>
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="64" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 2 Accent 2"></w:lsdexception>
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="65" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 1 Accent 2"></w:lsdexception>
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="66" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 2 Accent 2"></w:lsdexception>
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="67" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 1 Accent 2"></w:lsdexception>
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="68" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 2 Accent 2"></w:lsdexception>
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="69" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 3 Accent 2"></w:lsdexception>
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="70" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Dark List Accent 2"></w:lsdexception>
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="71" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Shading Accent 2"></w:lsdexception>
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="72" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful List Accent 2"></w:lsdexception>
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="73" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Grid Accent 2"></w:lsdexception>
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="60" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Shading Accent 3"></w:lsdexception>
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="61" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light List Accent 3"></w:lsdexception>
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="62" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Grid Accent 3"></w:lsdexception>
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="63" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 1 Accent 3"></w:lsdexception>
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="64" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 2 Accent 3"></w:lsdexception>
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="65" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 1 Accent 3"></w:lsdexception>
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="66" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 2 Accent 3"></w:lsdexception>
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="67" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 1 Accent 3"></w:lsdexception>
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="68" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 2 Accent 3"></w:lsdexception>
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="69" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 3 Accent 3"></w:lsdexception>
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="70" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Dark List Accent 3"></w:lsdexception>
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="71" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Shading Accent 3"></w:lsdexception>
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="72" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful List Accent 3"></w:lsdexception>
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="73" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Grid Accent 3"></w:lsdexception>
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="60" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Shading Accent 4"></w:lsdexception>
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="61" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light List Accent 4"></w:lsdexception>
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="62" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Grid Accent 4"></w:lsdexception>
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="63" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 1 Accent 4"></w:lsdexception>
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="64" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 2 Accent 4"></w:lsdexception>
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="65" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 1 Accent 4"></w:lsdexception>
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="66" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 2 Accent 4"></w:lsdexception>
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="67" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 1 Accent 4"></w:lsdexception>
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="68" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 2 Accent 4"></w:lsdexception>
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="69" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 3 Accent 4"></w:lsdexception>
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="70" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Dark List Accent 4"></w:lsdexception>
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="71" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Shading Accent 4"></w:lsdexception>
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="72" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful List Accent 4"></w:lsdexception>
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="73" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Grid Accent 4"></w:lsdexception>
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="60" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Shading Accent 5"></w:lsdexception>
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="61" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light List Accent 5"></w:lsdexception>
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="62" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Grid Accent 5"></w:lsdexception>
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="63" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 1 Accent 5"></w:lsdexception>
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="64" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 2 Accent 5"></w:lsdexception>
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="65" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 1 Accent 5"></w:lsdexception>
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="66" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 2 Accent 5"></w:lsdexception>
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="67" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 1 Accent 5"></w:lsdexception>
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="68" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 2 Accent 5"></w:lsdexception>
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="69" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 3 Accent 5"></w:lsdexception>
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="70" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Dark List Accent 5"></w:lsdexception>
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="71" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Shading Accent 5"></w:lsdexception>
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="72" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful List Accent 5"></w:lsdexception>
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="73" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Grid Accent 5"></w:lsdexception>
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="60" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Shading Accent 6"></w:lsdexception>
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="61" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light List Accent 6"></w:lsdexception>
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="62" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Grid Accent 6"></w:lsdexception>
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="63" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 1 Accent 6"></w:lsdexception>
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="64" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 2 Accent 6"></w:lsdexception>
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="65" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 1 Accent 6"></w:lsdexception>
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="66" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 2 Accent 6"></w:lsdexception>
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="67" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 1 Accent 6"></w:lsdexception>
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="68" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 2 Accent 6"></w:lsdexception>
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="69" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 3 Accent 6"></w:lsdexception>
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="70" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Dark List Accent 6"></w:lsdexception>
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="71" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Shading Accent 6"></w:lsdexception>
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="72" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful List Accent 6"></w:lsdexception>
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="73" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Grid Accent 6"></w:lsdexception>
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="19" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="Subtle Emphasis"></w:lsdexception>
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="21" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="Intense Emphasis"></w:lsdexception>
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="31" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="Subtle Reference"></w:lsdexception>
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="32" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="Intense Reference"></w:lsdexception>
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="33" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="Book Title"></w:lsdexception>
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="37" Name="Bibliography"></w:lsdexception>
<w:lsdexception Locked="false" Priority="39" QFormat="true" Name="TOC Heading"></w:lsdexception>
</w:latentstyles>
</xml>< ![endif]--><!-- [if gte mso 10]>
<style>
/* Style Definitions */
table.MsoNormalTable
{mso-style-name:"Table Normal";
mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;
mso-tstyle-colband-size:0;
mso-style-noshow:yes;
mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-parent:"";
mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt;
mso-para-margin:0in;
mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt;
mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman","serif";}
</style>
< ![endif]--><span style="font-size: 11.0pt;">A sage once said, “<i>The time to worry about where the ball will drop is before the wheel is spun</i>”.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>He was speaking about roulette, of course, but the wisdom of these words has much broader application.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>The point is, worry about the outcome before you place the bet, when you can still do something about it.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 11.0pt;">Commercial litigation, especially commercial real estate litigation, is in some respects like roulette. Once your lawsuit is filed, the wheel is spinning.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>Unlike roulette, you may still have a measure of control over the outcome — but you are in it until the ball drops.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 11.0pt;">In CRE litigation there is seldom an insurance company prepared to write a check.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>There is a substantial risk the case will proceed to trial.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>There is no guaranty you will collect anything – especially if payment of money is not the relief you seek. Consequently, there is very little chance your attorney will accept your commercial dispute on a contingent fee basis. A third of nothing is still nothing.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span></span></p>
<div class="wp-block-image">
<figure class="alignleft"><a href="https://i0.wp.com/harp-onthis.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/RSP_LogoFull_2PMS.jpg"><img data-recalc-dims="1" loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="300" height="109" data-attachment-id="283" data-permalink="http://harp-onthis.com/about/rsp_logofull_2pms/" data-orig-file="https://i0.wp.com/harp-onthis.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/RSP_LogoFull_2PMS.jpg?fit=963%2C350" data-orig-size="963,350" data-comments-opened="1" data-image-meta="{"aperture":"0","credit":"","camera":"","caption":"","created_timestamp":"0","copyright":"","focal_length":"0","iso":"0","shutter_speed":"0","title":""}" data-image-title="RSP_LogoFull_2PMS" data-image-description="" data-image-caption="" data-medium-file="https://i0.wp.com/harp-onthis.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/RSP_LogoFull_2PMS.jpg?fit=300%2C109" data-large-file="https://i0.wp.com/harp-onthis.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/RSP_LogoFull_2PMS.jpg?fit=963%2C350" src="https://i0.wp.com/harp-onthis.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/RSP_LogoFull_2PMS.jpg?resize=300%2C109" alt="RSP_LogoFull_2PMS" class="wp-image-283" srcset="https://i0.wp.com/harp-onthis.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/RSP_LogoFull_2PMS.jpg?resize=300%2C109 300w, https://i0.wp.com/harp-onthis.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/RSP_LogoFull_2PMS.jpg?resize=500%2C181 500w, https://i0.wp.com/harp-onthis.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/RSP_LogoFull_2PMS.jpg?w=963 963w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px" /></a></figure></div>
<p><span style="font-size: 11.0pt;">Lawyers handling commercial litigation are not your partners. Commercial litigators charge by the hour.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>Except in rare cases where you can negotiate a hybrid fee arrangement, you will assume the entire financial risk – not your lawyer. Your lawyer is serving as your paid professional advocate; a hired gun, so to speak. </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 11.0pt;">As long as you are willing and able to pay your lawyer to apply his or her skill and training to your cause, your lawyer is bound to represent you with zeal and vigor. If you do not pay, you should expect your lawyer to stop work.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>The fact that the practice of law is a profession does not make it a charitable enterprise. It is both a profession and a business.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>There is no moral or ethical imperative for a lawyer to work without pay while advocating a commercial dispute.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>CRE litigation is business litigation – and the business being advanced is yours. </span><wp-block data-block="core/more"></wp-block></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 11.0pt;">I am not a big fan of commercial litigation. It is expensive for my clients and distracts them from their core business.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>It is in their core business where they make money.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>It is because of their core business that I am their lawyer.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>Still, if you are going to litigate, then commit to litigate. Do not file a lawsuit unless you intend to see it through and win. </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 11.0pt;">If you know anything about law firm profitability, it may surprise you to hear me say I am not a huge fan of litigation. Lawsuits can be very profitable for lawyers. Lawsuits are labor intensive and can take on a life of their own.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>Huge legal fees can be run up in a hurry.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>If that is how you determine to spend your money then, by all means, call me.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>My law firm has an outstanding group of litigators.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>In commercial litigation, including CRE litigation, we combine our transactional knowledge with litigation prowess and are unsurpassed. I just think you ought to make an informed and seriously calculated decision before you decide to spend your money in this way. </span></p>
<div class="wp-block-image">
<figure class="alignleft"><a href="https://i0.wp.com/harp-onthis.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/Dancing-Gorilla-image-iStock-license.jpg"><img data-recalc-dims="1" loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="199" height="300" data-attachment-id="612" data-permalink="http://harp-onthis.com/dancing-gorillas-roulette-cre-litigation/dancing-gorilla-image-istock-license/" data-orig-file="https://i0.wp.com/harp-onthis.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/Dancing-Gorilla-image-iStock-license-e1380147240490.jpg?fit=1131%2C1698" data-orig-size="1131,1698" data-comments-opened="1" data-image-meta="{"aperture":"7.1","credit":"Rich Legg","camera":"Canon EOS 5D Mark III","caption":"","created_timestamp":"1370978971","copyright":"\u00a9 Rich Legg","focal_length":"73","iso":"100","shutter_speed":"0.008","title":""}" data-image-title="Dancing Gorilla image [iStock license]" data-image-description="" data-image-caption="" data-medium-file="https://i0.wp.com/harp-onthis.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/Dancing-Gorilla-image-iStock-license-e1380147240490.jpg?fit=199%2C300" data-large-file="https://i0.wp.com/harp-onthis.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/Dancing-Gorilla-image-iStock-license-e1380147240490.jpg?fit=682%2C1024" src="https://i0.wp.com/harp-onthis.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/Dancing-Gorilla-image-iStock-license.jpg?resize=199%2C300" alt="Dancing Gorilla image [iStock license]" class="wp-image-612"/></a></figure></div>
<p><span style="font-size: 11.0pt;">It is virtually impossible to predict with accuracy how much a lawsuit will cost.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>Typically, it will cost much more than you imagine. This is because, unlike a business or real estate transaction you can choose to walk away from if it ceases to make economic sense, lawsuits, once filed, are not so easy to escape.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>It’s like choosing to dance with an 800 pound gorilla.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>As the joke goes, “When do you stop?<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>When the gorilla decides to stop.”<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>Once you have filed a lawsuit, or have taken a position in a dispute that will lead to your adversary filing a lawsuit, you have reached the dance floor and may very well find yourself cheek to cheek with an 800 pound gorilla. </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 11.0pt;">Don’t get me wrong.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>There are times when litigation is necessary and appropriate.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>There are times when an adversary is so brazenly interfering with your business or trampling on your rights and interests that the benefits of litigation will far exceed your costs.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>There are times when litigation is your only reasonable choice.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 11.0pt;">In making the decision to proceed, however, understand the tangible and intangible costs.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>Attorneys’ fees may run into tens of thousands of dollars, and in a complicated case perhaps even into the hundreds of thousands of dollars. The litigation may also distract you from your core business and subject you to significant emotional strain and sleepless nights.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>Do not underestimate these add-on intangible costs.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 11.0pt;">If you are going to litigate, be sure to hire a<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>lawyer experienced in the type of litigation you intend to<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>pursue.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>Litigation strategy is based on game theory.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>Each move you make must anticipate your adversary’s next several moves. Your strategy and its implementation must be designed to win and be agile enough to adapt to changing circumstances if your adversary moves forward in an unanticipated way.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>Knowledge is power.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 11.0pt;">Part of what makes litigation emotionally draining is a lack of understanding about how the process works.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>It is not as mysterious as clients sometimes seem to believe. </span></p>
<p><i style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal;"><span style="font-size: 11.0pt;">The bones of litigation are this</span></i><span style="font-size: 11.0pt;">:<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>You and your adversary are in disagreement. You are convinced your position is superior.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>Your adversary is convinced its position is superior. You are unable to reach a compromise that works for you both.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>Filing a lawsuit is a decision to let someone else decide.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 11.0pt;">The litigation process is a process of gathering useful information to support your position and to undermine your opponent’s position. Your adversary is engaged in the same process. Some of this information is applicable law. Much of the information is supporting facts. Ultimately, you will each present your compiled information to an independent decision maker.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>A judge or jury will decide. </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 11.0pt;">If you are going to litigate, the decision to do so should be based upon a sober determination of the benefits likely to be achieved, the costs of obtaining those benefits, and your likelihood of success.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>You may have the greatest case in the world; your lawyer may tell you it will be a “<i style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal;">slam dunk</i>”; but if it is going to cost you more than you reasonably expect to gain – measuring both tangible and intangible costs – at least consider the choice of not proceeding. The decision to proceed or not to proceed is yours. It is very much a business decision.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 11.0pt;">In making the decision to litigate, use the same skills of economic analysis you use to make real estate investment decisions. If you know it will cost you $2,000,000 to develop and market a project, but your likely return is only $1,500,000, would you proceed?<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>If your disputed claim is for $50,000 but it will cost you $60,000 to $100,000 to collect, should you proceed?<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>The answer may depend upon other factors as well but, all else being equal, the rational economic choice is obvious.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 11.0pt;">Too often lawsuits are filed as an emotional response to a perceived slight rather than being based upon an objective determination that the lawsuit is in your best economic interest. Do not let elevated testosterone levels get in the way of making a rational economic decision.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>The<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>lawsuit is likely to continue long after your passions have faded.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>By that time, you may be wrapped in the arms of that 800 pound gorilla.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>If you have not made the decision to litigate based upon legitimate and dispassionate commercial considerations, you may find that your only way out is to settle on highly unfavorable terms.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>This will not help you prosper.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 11.0pt;">A common mistake clients make is to assume that if a dispute is over only $10,000 to $50,000, the attorneys’ fees for pursuing or defending the case will be proportionately less than if the lawsuit involved $100,000 to $1,000,000.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>This is not necessarily so.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>The amount of time it takes to prove your case has very little to do with the amount in dispute. <span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>The facts and issues, and the response of your adversary, determine the amount of time involved.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>Since commercial litigation is typically billed by the hour, more time means higher attorneys’ fees regardless of the amount in dispute.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>This reality should be taken into consideration when deciding to file suit, and likewise when considering an offer of settlement.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 11.0pt;">Some protection may be provided by the documents if they provide for the successful party to recover attorneys’ fees and costs from the unsuccessful party. But note: (i) you had better be sure you will be the successful party, or you may end up paying your adversary’s attorneys’ fees as well as your own; and (ii) you should consider whether a judgment against this particular defendant is likely to be collected.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>If the defendant is on the verge of bankruptcy, or otherwise insolvent, obtaining a judgment that includes all of your attorneys’ fees will do you little good.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>You will have just spent more money that will not be collectible.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>As the saying goes: “<i style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal;">When you find yourself in a hole – stop digging</i>.”</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 11.0pt;">Remember.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>The commercial dispute forming the basis of your lawsuit is yours, not your attorney’s.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>Your attorney’s business is to represent you as your skilled professional advocate. Attorneys are bound to zealously advocate for your success, but they can not guaranty success and collection. </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 11.0pt;">Deciding to file a lawsuit in a commercial dispute should be like deciding to get a kidney transplant.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>It should be a decision that is not entered into lightly, and should be made only if the benefits to be obtained are greater than the burdens the procedure will entail. If you decide on a new kidney and go under the knife, be prepared to see it through. If, after the procedure has begun and your kidney has been removed, you change you mind and decide against a transplant, your decision is a bit too late.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>The time to make that decision was before you got on the operating table.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 11.0pt;">I am not saying you should never file a lawsuit.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>Each circumstance merits its own evaluation. What I am saying is that the time to decide is <i>before </i>the suit is filed.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>Once filed, be prepared to do what must be done to win.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;"> </span>It is too late to un-spin the wheel.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 11.0pt;"><span style="mso-tab-count: 7;"> </span><em>Thanks for listening,</em></span></p>
<p><em><span style="font-size: 11pt;"> Kymn</span></em></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 11.0pt;"> </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 11.0pt;"> </span></p>
<p> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
<wfw:commentRss>http://harp-onthis.com/dancing-gorillas-roulette-cre-litigation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">616</post-id> </item>
<item>
<title>REAFFIRMED: LLC Members Do NOT Have Interest in LLC Property</title>
<link>http://harp-onthis.com/llc-members-have-no-interest-in-llc-property/</link>
<comments>http://harp-onthis.com/llc-members-have-no-interest-in-llc-property/#respond</comments>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kymn Harp]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Sat, 07 Sep 2013 15:59:48 +0000</pubDate>
<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[Commercial Real Estate]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[lending]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[#CRE]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[commercial real estate]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[enforcement actions]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[lenders]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[limited liability company]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[LLC]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[LLC property]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[property]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[real estate]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[separateness of ownership]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[suit]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[what to look for]]></category>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://harp-onthis.com/?p=589</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Court Reaffirms that LLC Members Are Separate From the LLC and DO NOT Have An Ownership Interest In The LLC’s Property. Therefore Member Can File Lien. Just a brief post regarding LLC Property: On September 3, 2013, the Illinois Appellate […]]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<h1 class="wp-block-heading">Court Reaffirms that LLC Members Are Separate From the LLC and DO NOT Have An Ownership Interest In The LLC’s Property. Therefore Member Can File Lien.</h1>
<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><em><a href="https://i0.wp.com/harp-onthis.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/dreamstimemedium_28551060.jpg"><img data-recalc-dims="1" loading="lazy" decoding="async" data-attachment-id="518" data-permalink="http://harp-onthis.com/the-little-known-two-year-rule-for-employment-restrictive-covenants-illinois/httpwww-dreamstime-comstock-photo-confused-business-man-thinking-wich-way-to-go-image28551060/" data-orig-file="https://i0.wp.com/harp-onthis.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/dreamstimemedium_28551060.jpg?fit=1437%2C2087" data-orig-size="1437,2087" data-comments-opened="1" data-image-meta="{"aperture":"0","credit":"","camera":"","caption":"","created_timestamp":"0","copyright":"(c) Feedough | Dreamstime.com","focal_length":"0","iso":"0","shutter_speed":"0","title":"http:\/\/www.dreamstime.com\/stock-photo-confused-business-man-thinking-wich-way-to-go-image28551060"}" data-image-title="http://www.dreamstime.com/stock-photo-confused-business-man-thinking-wich-way-to-go-image28551060" data-image-description="" data-image-caption="" data-medium-file="https://i0.wp.com/harp-onthis.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/dreamstimemedium_28551060.jpg?fit=206%2C300" data-large-file="https://i0.wp.com/harp-onthis.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/dreamstimemedium_28551060.jpg?fit=705%2C1024" class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-518" src="https://i0.wp.com/harp-onthis.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/dreamstimemedium_28551060.jpg?resize=206%2C300" alt="http://www.dreamstime.com/stock-photo-confused-business-man-thinking-wich-way-to-go-image28551060" width="206" height="300" srcset="https://i0.wp.com/harp-onthis.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/dreamstimemedium_28551060.jpg?resize=206%2C300 206w, https://i0.wp.com/harp-onthis.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/dreamstimemedium_28551060.jpg?resize=705%2C1024 705w, https://i0.wp.com/harp-onthis.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/dreamstimemedium_28551060.jpg?w=1437 1437w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 206px) 100vw, 206px" /></a>Just a brief post regarding LLC Property:</em></h2>
<p>On September 3, 2013, the Illinois Appellate Court for the Fifth District filed an opinion in the case of <i style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal;">Peabody-Waterside Development, LLC v. Islands of Waterside, LLC, Regions Bank N.A., and Prairie Construction Management, LLC</i> 2013 IL App (5<sup>th</sup>) 120490.</p>
<p>The <a title="Peabody Waterside Case" href="http://www.state.il.us/court/Opinions/AppellateCourt/2013/5thDistrict/5120490.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Court’s Opinion</a> is consistent with Illinois law related to limited liability companies (LLC). The fact that the trial court got it wrong and had to be reversed, however, is not entirely surprising. Experience demonstrates that many lawyers, and courts, either don’t understand the law related to the separateness of an LLC from its members, or refuse to believe it.</p>
<p>The law in Illinois is quite clear. Members of an LLC have no ownership interest in the property or business of the LLC. Members own an economic interest in the distributable cash flow (if any) from the LLC, but no interest in the property or business that generates that cash flow. The LLC Act is clear. The case-law is clear. Like it or not, this is the law in Illinois (and in virtually all USA jurisdictions).</p>
<span id="more-589"></span>
<div class="wp-block-image">
<figure class="alignright size-full is-resized"><img data-recalc-dims="1" loading="lazy" decoding="async" data-attachment-id="1953" data-permalink="http://harp-onthis.com/llc-members-have-no-interest-in-llc-property/businessmeetingsofrealestatebrokersandcompanypresidentsto/" data-orig-file="https://i0.wp.com/harp-onthis.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/business-meetings-of-real-estate-brokers-and-company-presidents.jpg?fit=1000%2C667" data-orig-size="1000,667" data-comments-opened="1" data-image-meta="{"aperture":"0","credit":"Shutterstock","camera":"","caption":"","created_timestamp":"0","copyright":"Copyright (c) 2017 PanuShot\/Shutterstock. No use without permission.","focal_length":"0","iso":"0","shutter_speed":"0","title":"Business,Meetings,Of,Real,Estate,Brokers,And,Company,Presidents,To","orientation":"0"}" data-image-title="Business,Meetings,Of,Real,Estate,Brokers,And,Company,Presidents,To" data-image-description="" data-image-caption="" data-medium-file="https://i0.wp.com/harp-onthis.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/business-meetings-of-real-estate-brokers-and-company-presidents.jpg?fit=300%2C200" data-large-file="https://i0.wp.com/harp-onthis.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/business-meetings-of-real-estate-brokers-and-company-presidents.jpg?fit=1000%2C667" src="https://i0.wp.com/harp-onthis.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/business-meetings-of-real-estate-brokers-and-company-presidents.jpg?resize=400%2C267" alt="business meetings of real estate brokers and company presidents" class="wp-image-1953" width="400" height="267" srcset="https://i0.wp.com/harp-onthis.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/business-meetings-of-real-estate-brokers-and-company-presidents.jpg?w=1000 1000w, https://i0.wp.com/harp-onthis.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/business-meetings-of-real-estate-brokers-and-company-presidents.jpg?resize=300%2C200 300w, https://i0.wp.com/harp-onthis.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/business-meetings-of-real-estate-brokers-and-company-presidents.jpg?resize=768%2C512 768w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 400px) 100vw, 400px" /></figure></div>
<p>The issue arises when creditors try to collect judgments or other debts owed by members against assets of an LLC; when creditors try to pierce the entity veil without proving fraud; and in a variety of other circumstances.</p>
<p>In the <i style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal;">Peabody-Waterside </i>case, Peabody-Waterside was a 50% member of Islands of Waterside, LLC, and entered into an arm’s-length contract to provide construction services on land owned by Islands of Waterside, LLC. When Peabody-Waterside was not paid, it filed a mechanics lien against the property which, if enforceable, may result in a priority lien over the mortgage lien of Regions Bank.</p>
<p>Regions Bank defended by asserting that the mechanics lien was void because Peabody-Waterside was “<i style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal;">jointly interested</i>” in the property against which the mechanics lien was filed. [Under Illinois law, a co-owner of property cannot file a valid mechanics lien against the property because it is “jointly interested” in the property.] The trial court agreed, and found the mechanics lien to be void. Peabody-Waterside appealed.</p>
<p>On appeal, the Appellate Court correctly pointed out that “<i style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal;">a limited liability company is a legal entity distinct from its members</i>.” It also pointed out that “<i style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal;">Illinois law clearly states . . . that membership in a limited liability company does not confer any ownership interest in the property, real or personal, of the LLC. 805 ILCS 180/30-1(a) (West 2008) (member of an LLC is not a co-owner of, and has no transferable interest in, property of a limited liability company). A member of an LLC owns only its membership interest in the LLC. . . . This is the reason why a creditor of an LLC member cannot seize LLC property to satisfy a member’s debt. The creditor can only attach the member’s distributional interest in the LLC because that is all the member owns. 805 ILCS 180/30-20(a)(West 2008)</i>.”</p>
<p>If you are a creditor, you need to understand this.If you are a debtor, this clear legal distinction provides some remarkable asset protection opportunities through use of LLCs.</p>
<p>Something to think about . . .</p>
<p>Thanks for listening.</p>
<p>Kymn</p>
]]></content:encoded>
<wfw:commentRss>http://harp-onthis.com/llc-members-have-no-interest-in-llc-property/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">589</post-id> </item>
<item>
<title>The “little known” Two-Year Rule for Employment Restrictive Covenants – Illinois</title>
<link>http://harp-onthis.com/the-little-known-two-year-rule-for-employment-restrictive-covenants-illinois/</link>
<comments>http://harp-onthis.com/the-little-known-two-year-rule-for-employment-restrictive-covenants-illinois/#respond</comments>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kymn Harp]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 27 Jun 2013 22:58:57 +0000</pubDate>
<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[Commercial Real Estate]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[White Papers]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[business]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[Chicago]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[commercial real estate business]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[consequences]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[default]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[employer]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[employment]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[employment law]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[enforcement actions]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[Illinois]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[law]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[non-compete]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[restrictive covenants]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[suit]]></category>
<category><![CDATA[what to look for]]></category>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://harp-onthis.com/?p=559</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Employment Restrictive Covenants The issue of enforceability of employment restrictive covenants comes up often in business, including the business of commercial real estate. A common scenario is as follows:  A person goes to work for a company and is required […]]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><b>Employment Restrictive Covenants</b></h2>
<p>The issue of enforceability of employment restrictive covenants comes up often in business, including the business of commercial real estate.</p>
<div class="wp-block-image">
<figure class="alignleft"><a href="https://i0.wp.com/harp-onthis.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/dreamstimemedium_28551060.jpg"><img data-recalc-dims="1" loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="206" height="300" data-attachment-id="518" data-permalink="http://harp-onthis.com/the-little-known-two-year-rule-for-employment-restrictive-covenants-illinois/httpwww-dreamstime-comstock-photo-confused-business-man-thinking-wich-way-to-go-image28551060/" data-orig-file="https://i0.wp.com/harp-onthis.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/dreamstimemedium_28551060.jpg?fit=1437%2C2087" data-orig-size="1437,2087" data-comments-opened="1" data-image-meta="{"aperture":"0","credit":"","camera":"","caption":"","created_timestamp":"0","copyright":"(c) Feedough | Dreamstime.com","focal_length":"0","iso":"0","shutter_speed":"0","title":"http:\/\/www.dreamstime.com\/stock-photo-confused-business-man-thinking-wich-way-to-go-image28551060"}" data-image-title="http://www.dreamstime.com/stock-photo-confused-business-man-thinking-wich-way-to-go-image28551060" data-image-description="" data-image-caption="" data-medium-file="https://i0.wp.com/harp-onthis.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/dreamstimemedium_28551060.jpg?fit=206%2C300" data-large-file="https://i0.wp.com/harp-onthis.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/dreamstimemedium_28551060.jpg?fit=705%2C1024" src="https://i0.wp.com/harp-onthis.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/dreamstimemedium_28551060.jpg?resize=206%2C300" alt="http://www.dreamstime.com/stock-photo-confused-business-man-thinking-wich-way-to-go-image28551060" class="wp-image-518" srcset="https://i0.wp.com/harp-onthis.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/dreamstimemedium_28551060.jpg?resize=206%2C300 206w, https://i0.wp.com/harp-onthis.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/dreamstimemedium_28551060.jpg?resize=705%2C1024 705w, https://i0.wp.com/harp-onthis.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/dreamstimemedium_28551060.jpg?w=1437 1437w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 206px) 100vw, 206px" /></a></figure></div>
<p>A common scenario is as follows: A person goes to work for a company and is required to sign a Noncompetition and Nonsolicitation Agreement. Typically, it will say something like “<i>during the term of employment, and for a period of one year after termination of employment, the employee will not compete with or solicit any customer or vendor of the employer</i>.” Sometimes the Noncompetition/Nonsolicitation Agreement is required to be signed as a condition of being hired. Other times the employer will tell an employee who is already employed that signing the Noncompetition/Nonsolicitation Agreement is a condition to continued employment.</p>
<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><b>Are Employment Noncompetition/Nonsolicitation Agreements enforceable in Illinois?</b></h2>
<p>As a general proposition, Noncompetition/Nonsolicitation Agreements are enforceable in Illinois, as long as they satisfy a three-pronged test: They: (1) must be no greater in scope and duration than is required for the protection of a legitimate business interest of the employer-promisee; (2) must not impose undue hardship on the employee-promisor, and (3) must not be injurious to the public.</p>
<p>In a decision filed December 1, 2011, the Illinois Supreme Court shook up the Illinois employment bar by overruling an extensive line of cases that had narrowed the three-pronged test described above to a two-pronged test created by Appellate Court decision in 1973. In a case referred to as the <i>Kolar </i>decision, (<i>Nationwide Advertising Service, Inc. v. Kolar</i>, 14 Ill. Ap. 3d 522 (1973), the <i>Kolar</i> court held that an employment restrictive covenant was valid if there were (i) a near permanent customer relationship with the employer, and (ii) the employee had gained confidential information through its employment. The Illinois Supreme Court emphasized in its December 2011 opinion that the <i>Kolar</i> test is not valid. (<i>Reliable Fire Equipment Company vs. Arredondo</i> 2011 IL 111871). The Illinois Supreme Court, instead, reaffirmed the <i>legitimate business interest</i> test, and clarified that “<i>whether a legitimate business interest exists is based on the totality of the facts and circumstances of the individual case. Factors to be considered in the analysis include, but are not limited to, the near-permanence of customer relationships, the employee’s acquisition of confidential information through his employment, and time and place restrictions. No factor carries any more weight than any other, but rather its importance will depend on the specific facts and circumstances of the individual case</i>.”</p>
<p>For the most part, the Illinois employer’s bar hailed the <i>Arrendondo</i> decision as a victory, believing it gave employers a broader basis for enforcing employment restrictive covenants. Ironically, many attorney’s representing primarily employees were encouraged by the <i>Arrendondo</i> decision as well, believing it gives employees more room to challenge enforceability by challenging, factually, whether a “<i>legitimate business interest</i>” is at stake.</p>
<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><b>“Little Known” Two-Year Rule for Employment Restrictive Covenants – Illinois</b></h2>
<div class="wp-block-image">
<figure class="alignright size-full is-resized"><img data-recalc-dims="1" loading="lazy" decoding="async" data-attachment-id="1897" data-permalink="http://harp-onthis.com/the-little-known-two-year-rule-for-employment-restrictive-covenants-illinois/thelawshouldknowtheconceptbusinessentrepreneurwomanread/" data-orig-file="https://i0.wp.com/harp-onthis.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/read-the-rules-of-business-that-her-does-business.jpg?fit=1000%2C667" data-orig-size="1000,667" data-comments-opened="1" data-image-meta="{"aperture":"0","credit":"Shutterstock","camera":"","caption":"","created_timestamp":"0","copyright":"Copyright (c) 2018 Jirapong Manustrong\/Shutterstock. No use without permission.","focal_length":"0","iso":"0","shutter_speed":"0","title":"The,Law,Should,Know,The,Concept,,Business,Entrepreneur,Woman,,Read","orientation":"1"}" data-image-title="The,Law,Should,Know,The,Concept,,Business,Entrepreneur,Woman,,Read" data-image-description="" data-image-caption="" data-medium-file="https://i0.wp.com/harp-onthis.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/read-the-rules-of-business-that-her-does-business.jpg?fit=300%2C200" data-large-file="https://i0.wp.com/harp-onthis.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/read-the-rules-of-business-that-her-does-business.jpg?fit=1000%2C667" src="https://i0.wp.com/harp-onthis.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/read-the-rules-of-business-that-her-does-business.jpg?resize=400%2C267" alt="read the rules of business that her does business" class="wp-image-1897" width="400" height="267" srcset="https://i0.wp.com/harp-onthis.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/read-the-rules-of-business-that-her-does-business.jpg?w=1000 1000w, https://i0.wp.com/harp-onthis.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/read-the-rules-of-business-that-her-does-business.jpg?resize=300%2C200 300w, https://i0.wp.com/harp-onthis.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/read-the-rules-of-business-that-her-does-business.jpg?resize=768%2C512 768w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 400px) 100vw, 400px" /></figure></div>
<p>While the foregoing is all well and good, a fundamental concept of law is that employment </p>
<span id="more-559"></span>
<p>restrictive covenants are creatures of contract. Employment restrictive covenants exist, and are enforceable, only if created by valid contract. If there is no valid contract, there is no enforceable restrictive covenant.</p>
<p>Basic contact law requires three elements as a condition to contract formation: (i) offer, (ii) acceptance, and (iii) adequate consideration.</p>
<p>Irrespective of what we learned in law school about “peppercorns” being adequate consideration, it is precisely the <i>consideration</i> aspect of contact formation that renders many employment restrictive covenants unenforceable.</p>
<p>By Appellate Court decision handed down on June 24, 2013, we are “<i>reminded</i>” of a body of Illinois case law that renders many employment restrictive covenants unenforceable by employers of Illinois-based employees. With internal citations and extraneous text omitted for this post, the First District Appellate Court [<i>Fifield and Enterprise Financial Group, Inc. vs. Premier Dealer Services, Inc</i>., 2013 IL App (1<sup>st</sup>) 120327] held as follows:</p>
<p><i>“Postemployment restrictive covenants </i>[i.e. restrictive covenants that purport to apply after employment ends]<i> are carefully scrutinized by Illinois courts because they operate as partial restrictions on trade. In order for a restrictive covenant to be valid and enforceable, the terms of the covenant must be reasonable. However, before even considering whether a restrictive covenant is reasonable, the court must make two determinations: (1) whether the restrictive covenant is ancillary to a valid contract; and (2) whether the restrictive covenant is supported by adequate consideration.”</i></p>
<p><i>“Under Illinois law, continued employment for a substantial period of time beyond the threat of discharge is sufficient consideration to support a restrictive covenant in an employment agreement. Illinois courts analyze the adequacy of consideration in the context of post-employment restrictive covenants because it has recognized that a promise of continued employment may be an illusory benefit where the employment is at-will. Generally, Illinois courts have held that continued employment for two years or more constitutes adequate consideration. The restrictive covenant will not be enforced unless there is adequate consideration given.”</i></p>
[The Court noted that it makes no difference whether the restrictive covenant is required as a condition to being hired, or required as a condition of continued employment.]
<p><i>“Illinois courts have repeatedly held that there must be at least two years or more of continued employment to constitute adequate consideration in support of a restrictive covenant. The rule is maintained even if the employee resigns on his own instead of being terminated.”</i></p>
<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><b> What Does This Mean?</b></h2>
<p>In a nutshell, it means that in a typical employment restrictive covenant situation [as distinguished from a special circumstance where a restrictive covenant may be entered into as part of a business sale], the restrictive covenant will likely be <i>unenforceable</i> in Illinois unless the employee continues working for the employer for at least two years after the restrictive covenant is signed.</p>
<p>I’ll bet most employers – and their attorneys – don’t know that.</p>
<p>Like it or not – that is the current state of the law in Illinois.</p>
<p>For run-of-the-mill employment arrangements, it is an unavoidable reality. In special circumstances, where binding an employee to an enforceable restrictive covenant is of critical importance, a proper solution will take creativity to assure adequate consideration to support enforceability.</p>
<p>Thanks for listening,</p>
<p>Kymn</p>
<p> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
<wfw:commentRss>http://harp-onthis.com/the-little-known-two-year-rule-for-employment-restrictive-covenants-illinois/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">559</post-id> </item>
</channel>
</rss>